지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As a sequence on an offensive situation, this study analyzes the act of expressing displeasure while the author’s previous research was apologizing. It examines how the universal theory of politeness accounts for Korean and what implications are involved with theories. According to this study, displeasure is expressed through several forms such as mentioning the offense, stating obligation, or giving a directive. The choice of linguistic strategies shows similarity with other languages while a cross-cultural difference is found in the way of mitigating a facethreatening act. A common strategy of indirectly stating offense or obligation is the use of interrogative sentence in Korean. Being indirect is claimed as a universal feature for threatening acts in politeness theory (Brown and Levinson 1987; Goffman 1971). However, universal claims from a theoretical perspective may not apply crossculturally. A theory needs to be complemented by socio-cultural interpretation. For methodology, the data was collected from sequential research on verbal behavior occurring in offensive situations. To understand politeness in Korean, it takes into consideration linguistic behavior in the discourse level beyond the sentence level. The discourse-level analysis comes from observation-based speech. Controlled data collected through written questionnaires or role-plays tend to be limited to a single turn. Naturally-occurring data make it possible to look at contextual factors and social relationships between two parties.
목차
Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
3. DATA COLLECTION
4. ANALYSIS
5. DISCUSSION
6. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Characteristics of Korean Politeness: Imposition Is Not Always a Face Threatening Act
담화와인지
2003 .12
-
Face, Identities, and Confucian Values In Korean Institutional Discourse
언어과학연구
2013 .12
-
일본어 politeness 연구의 현황과 과제
일어일문학
2013 .05
-
Constituting Face and Identities in Korean Institutional Discourse
언어과학연구
2012 .12
-
비교문화 관점에서 본 한미의 언어문화와 공손표현에 대한 탐색
비평문학
2004 .06
-
Politeness in Korea and America : A Comparative Analysis of Request Strategy in English Communication
Korea Journal
2014 .03
-
한국어 화행에서 공손성의 실현 양상
한국어학
2013 .11
-
Interpretation of Linguistic Politeness
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2013 .06
-
Cultural Values, Korean Requests, and Institutional Discourse
언어과학연구
2014 .06
-
정중성의 의미와 쓰임에 관한 연구
영어영문학연구
2009 .01
-
공손성 번역의 적절성에 관한 연구 : 문장종결형에 나타난 공손성을 중심으로
새한영어영문학
2015 .05
-
커뮤니케이션에 있어 영어공손표현
영어영문학연구
2005 .01
-
A Study on Politeness in English to Korean & Korean to English Translation
새한영어영문학
2010 .11
-
A Review of Brown and Levinson's (1987) Politeness Theory
담화와인지
2003 .04
-
Revisiting Politeness Theories: Advice in the setting of reality TV in Mexican Spanish
스페인어문학
2011 .01
-
The Role of Confucian Scripts in Achieving Linguistic Politeness in Korean Requests
언어과학연구
2011 .12
-
Meta-pragmatic Function, Cultural Values and Korean Request Strategies
언어과학연구
2014 .12
-
Perception, Face and Confucian Values in Institutional Discourse
언어과학연구
2013 .06
-
The Influence of Computer-mediated Communication on Realizing Politeness Strategies
언어과학연구
2002 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Explicitness for Requests Is a Politer Strategy than Implicitness in Korean
Kyong-Ae Yu
담화와인지
2004
.04
Negative Politeness in Korean Questions : Interaction between Epistemic Uncertainty and Conventional Indirectness
A
,
um Kang
어학연구
2018
.08
구어에 나타난 종결어미 ‘-다’의 의미 기능에 대한 기술 문제
진관초
어문논총
2018
.02
한국어교육에서의 비교문화적 화행 연구와 교육적 적용
이해영
국어국문학
2016
.09
교수에 대한 대학생 언어행동의 한일비교
洪珉杓
일본연구
2012
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002723744