지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The extant research on politeness has been influenced by Brown and Levinson`s (1987) politeness theory. However, the author argues that this research tradition does not deal with meta-physical dimensions (e.g. epistemological, philosophical, and ethical aspects) embedded within (im)polite linguistic strategies. In the author`s understanding, politeness cannot just be equated with the outcome of face-threatening acts (FTA) because politeness is a multimodal discursive concept. This means that what is polite (or impolite) should not depend entirely on linguistic analysis but should focus on the diverse interactional factors arising from locally specific discourse contexts. This leads an observer to see politeness as existing beyond the discursive level, which necessarily incorporates perceptive dimensions (epistemological, philosophical, and cognitive). The author proposes that the Confucian frame, which individuals utilize in the construction of face and which reflect culturally shared thinking in Korean speech, is a useful concept to help investigate individual`s strategic face over politeness in contemporary Korean linguistic analysis. In this study, the author integrates a Confucian framework with the spoken discourse approach. The findings of this empirical research highlight two important aspects of Korean honorific use in relation to linguistic politeness. Firstly, cultural values affect the perception of ``R`` and function as face redress mechanisms so as to activate control over the social variables (P, D, and R). Secondly, the cultural script (the Confucian script) effectively negotiates institutional identities since Confucian thinking forms a foundation for a ``common-sense`` knowledge that underlies social practice. Cultural knowledge can thus be effectively used for communicating interpersonal face due to its pragmatic function.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (49)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Arundale, R. B / 2006 / Face as Relational and Interactional: a Communication Framework for Research on Face, Face Work, and Politeness / Journal of Politeness Research 2 (2) : 193 ~ 216
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Blum-Kulka, S / 1987 / Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different? / Journal of Pragmatics 11 (2) : 131 ~ 146
3. [학술대회논문] - Brown, L. / 2005 / Korean Honorifics, Politeness and Face, Poster Presentation Given at the “Politeness: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language and Culture” / Conference Hosted by the Linguistic Politeness Research Group on 12 March 2005
4. [단행본] - Brown, P. / 1978 / Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena, In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction / Cambridge University Press : 56 ~ 311
5. [단행본] - Brown, P. / 1987 / Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage / Cambridge University Press
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Blum-Kulka, S / 1987 / Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different? / Journal of Pragmatics 11 (2) : 131 ~ 146
3. [학술대회논문] - Brown, L. / 2005 / Korean Honorifics, Politeness and Face, Poster Presentation Given at the “Politeness: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language and Culture” / Conference Hosted by the Linguistic Politeness Research Group on 12 March 2005
4. [단행본] - Brown, P. / 1978 / Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena, In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction / Cambridge University Press : 56 ~ 311
5. [단행본] - Brown, P. / 1987 / Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage / Cambridge University Press
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002548458