지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I classified studies on politeness in Japanese into three types. There are those of (Ⅲ)studies which researchers applied politeness theory to Teaching Japanese as a foreign language, (Ⅱ)studies on politeness strategies in Japanese, (Ⅰ)theoretical studies on politeness. And I made a general survey of each study and presented four Tasks.
In the (Ⅰ)theoretical studies on politeness, Lakoff(1973), Leech(1983), Fraser(1990), Brown&Levinson(1987) (hereafter B&L(1987)) based on Grice(1975) are introduced, are made a general survey of studies associated with the B&L(1987).
(Ⅱ)studies on politeness strategies in Japanese were presented in the language behavior and specific linguistic form were introduced. An overview of the research results were shown in a variety of linguistic behavior, including specifically invitation, refusal, acceptance, request, consolation, advise. Studies that focuses on the specific linguistic form are the unfinished sentences, appellation, sentence-final form.
(Ⅲ)studies which researchers applied politeness theory to Teaching Japanese as a foreign language were presented linguistic behaviors is considered to be impolite in Japan by examination of Japanese learner’s pragmatics transfer.
Four future tasks are (1) the need to redefine politeness of the conceptual and analytical framework, (2) those which overcome limitations of empirical researches, (3)those which proceed briskly studies suggests specific teaching methods, (4)those which analyze comprehensively politeness in communication.
If politeness strategies in Japanese are organized by accumulation of studies on politeness strategy, reorganization of B&L(1987)’s thoery and Japanese politeness theory will be organized. And studies which researchers applied politeness theory to Teaching Japanese as a foreign language will be activated.
In the (Ⅰ)theoretical studies on politeness, Lakoff(1973), Leech(1983), Fraser(1990), Brown&Levinson(1987) (hereafter B&L(1987)) based on Grice(1975) are introduced, are made a general survey of studies associated with the B&L(1987).
(Ⅱ)studies on politeness strategies in Japanese were presented in the language behavior and specific linguistic form were introduced. An overview of the research results were shown in a variety of linguistic behavior, including specifically invitation, refusal, acceptance, request, consolation, advise. Studies that focuses on the specific linguistic form are the unfinished sentences, appellation, sentence-final form.
(Ⅲ)studies which researchers applied politeness theory to Teaching Japanese as a foreign language were presented linguistic behaviors is considered to be impolite in Japan by examination of Japanese learner’s pragmatics transfer.
Four future tasks are (1) the need to redefine politeness of the conceptual and analytical framework, (2) those which overcome limitations of empirical researches, (3)those which proceed briskly studies suggests specific teaching methods, (4)those which analyze comprehensively politeness in communication.
If politeness strategies in Japanese are organized by accumulation of studies on politeness strategy, reorganization of B&L(1987)’s thoery and Japanese politeness theory will be organized. And studies which researchers applied politeness theory to Teaching Japanese as a foreign language will be activated.
목차
Abstract
1. 머리말
2. 선행연구의 개관
3. 과제
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 고인수 / 1996 / 언어학적 공손이론의 재평가: 영어와 한국어를 중심으로 / 인문논총 10
2. [단행본] - 井出祥子 / 2006 / わきまえの語用論 / 大修館書店
3. [단행본] - 井出祥子 / 1986 / 日本人とアメリカ人の敬語行動-大学生の場合- / 南雲堂
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 李善姫 / 2004 / 韓国人日本語学習者の"不満表明" について / 日本語教育 (123)
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이종화 / 2006 / ポライトネスからみた省略表現の意味 / 일어일문학 (30) : 55 ~ 76
2. [단행본] - 井出祥子 / 2006 / わきまえの語用論 / 大修館書店
3. [단행본] - 井出祥子 / 1986 / 日本人とアメリカ人の敬語行動-大学生の場合- / 南雲堂
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 李善姫 / 2004 / 韓国人日本語学習者の"不満表明" について / 日本語教育 (123)
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이종화 / 2006 / ポライトネスからみた省略表現の意味 / 일어일문학 (30) : 55 ~ 76
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
비교문화 관점에서 본 한미의 언어문화와 공손표현에 대한 탐색
류관수
비평문학
2004
.06
요청화행과 공손성 표현의 사용에 대한 텍스트 비교연구
박선옥
언어과학연구
2005
.09
화용론과 공손의 규칙
조준학
어학연구
1980
.06
체면, 소통 그리고 갈등해소 : 체면-소통모델과 소통의 가능성 모색
김영욱
,
양정은
한국언론학회 심포지움 및 세미나
2011
.05
공손법(Politeness)이 쓰이는 동인(Motivation)과 그에 관련된 공손책략(Polite Strategy) : 한국ㆍ중국ㆍ일본 작품을 통하여
김선희
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1997
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002615781