지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Brown and Levinson (1987) claim that honorifics are used strategically to soften face threatening acts. However, they hardly see that cultural values embedded in honorific devices function as a ‘pragmatic mediator’ in the construction of (im)politeness. Since Confucian cultural values are intrinsically built within honorific forms and are permeated into Korean culture and politeness, this cultural knowledge has become a powerful social norm in Korean society. The local situation, particularly “local context, the speaker’s intention, and local norms” are mainly concerned with interactional goals. Formality therefore is not always a synonym of politeness (Locher 2004). Moreover, cultural values function as marked forms regarding interactional discourse strategies. ‘Perceptions reflected in meta-linguistic behavior’ thus require cultural values to precisely interpret linguistic behavior, especially within discourse contexts. Nonetheless, previous research on politeness has neglected to analyze linguistic behavior anchored on the speaker’s manipulation of cultural values. The current study extends pre-existent politeness research in two important ways. First, cultural values embedded within honorifics are strategically used to convey the speaker’s intentions at the discursive level. Second, it observes that strategic uses of positive politeness strategies play key roles in mitigating face threats at the meta-pragmatic level. A speaker’s pragmatic goal is thus efficiently achieved by utilizing cultural values.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 김주식 / 2013 / 의미론의 본질 / 한국문화사
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Arundale, R. B / 2006 / Face as Relational and Interactional: a Communication Framework for Research on Face, Face Work, and Politeness / Journal of Politeness Research 2 : 193 ~ 216
3. [단행본] - Brown, L. / 2011 / Korean Honorifics and ‘Revealed’, Ignored’ and ‘Suppressed’ Aspects of Korean Culture and Politeness / Palgrave Macmillan : 106 ~ 127
4. [단행본] - Bourdieu, P. / 1991 / Language and Symbolic Power / Polity Press
5. [단행본] - Brow Brown, P. / 1987 / Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage / Cambridge University Press
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Arundale, R. B / 2006 / Face as Relational and Interactional: a Communication Framework for Research on Face, Face Work, and Politeness / Journal of Politeness Research 2 : 193 ~ 216
3. [단행본] - Brown, L. / 2011 / Korean Honorifics and ‘Revealed’, Ignored’ and ‘Suppressed’ Aspects of Korean Culture and Politeness / Palgrave Macmillan : 106 ~ 127
4. [단행본] - Bourdieu, P. / 1991 / Language and Symbolic Power / Polity Press
5. [단행본] - Brow Brown, P. / 1987 / Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage / Cambridge University Press
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
The Role of Cultural Values and Perception as Reflected in Korean Request Strategies
Jin-Ok Hong
언어과학연구
2015
.06
격식성에 따른 한국어 요청화행 전략 및 공손 표현 : 드라마 말뭉치를 중심으로
김지영
,
이선웅
우리말글
2023
.03
한국어 요청 화행의 언어 유형론적 분석 시론(試論)
윤창숙
,
박소영
언어과학연구
2022
.12
공격화행의 양면성 대조 연구: 가족 담화와 토론 담화를 중심으로
한승훈
신영어영문학
2022
.02
한국어 교재에 나타난 직접 요청 화행 유형 분석
윤주리
교육연구
2021
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002521468