메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제59집
발행연도
2011.12
수록면
369 - 394 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Ever since Brown and Levinson (1978, 1987) proposed their politeness formula, a wealth of criticism has been voiced regarding their politeness theory. They acknowledge the possibility of different cultural weight given to the power (P), distance (D), and degree of imposition variables (R) in the choice of polite linguistic forms. However, they are also criticized for under-analyzing generally R. A variety of cultural and contextual factors may influence the extent to which a face-threatening act (FTA) is rated as an imposition, which cannot be sufficiently captured within Brown and Levinson`s framework. This study highlights three important aspects of Korean requests in relation to linguistic politeness. First, Confucian cultural modes as a communication framework penetrate the discourse practices within institutional settings. In essence the functional aspects of Confucian cultural values play a more important role than linguistic forms in the negotiation of successful requests. Second, the functional use of culture- specific ``discernment`` can also be used as a face redress mechanism, and allows speakers to control imposition and to make successful requests. Third, politeness should be understood from both culture-specific perspectives and linguistic indirectness. Cultural values play a more important role than linguistic forms in situations where the FTAs are very high. (Inje University)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002563217