메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제69집
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
357 - 382 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Brown and Levinson (1987) acknowledge the possibility of different cultural weight given to the parameters of social distance, status and degree of imposition and difference in politeness styles. Subsequent studies on politeness research have followed Brown and Levinson`s politeness formula. The postmodern theorists` (Watts & Locher) approaches has made great contributions to the functional aspects of politeness studies since they regard politeness forms as flexible, negotiable and functional in local discourse contexts. Especially, Locher (2004) claims that “status is a complex, negotiable variable and power is regarded as relational, dynamic and contestable.” Locher`s claim that what is appropriate and normal is not static, but a dynamic and changeable entity that is dependent heavily on the ‘speech event`` at hand, is a revolutionary view that other researchers have not made. Nevertheless, her pragmatic approach to politeness still needs to acknowledge that the interactional nature of politeness focuses on variability derived from cultural values. The findings of this study extend far beyond the previous politeness research. First, Korean relational work requires Confucian cultural knowledge and is a crucial element in the construction of institutional identity. Second, Korean politeness should be understood from a culture-specific framework by using natural language data since Korean speakers employ culturally shared knowledge in order to better negotiate their discursive stance on an interactional level.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-700-002520198