지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Three months ago Korean Ministry of Justice has announced that in domestic cases the diversion program named 'indictment suspension under the condition of consultation' would in time come into operation in all prosecution offices. The model program is being under test in several prosecution offices from June 2003. This article raises an objection to that program because it cannot be an effective method to diminish the domestic violence and to protect the victims from the danger of battering.
Although the Domestic Violence Act was legislated in 1997, it has not proven how much the Act contributed to reduce the domestic violence crimes. Many scholars and victim support groups criticize that judicial reaction system of the Act is too weak to deter the serious battering crimes. There are many obstacles in the judicial enforcement, because many people still regard the domestic violence as a lover's quarrel, not as a crime. In this situation the diversion to consultation program bears an obvious danger in accomplishing the aim of the Act, that is, "prevention of domestic violence". That diversion program has an effect that makes people regard the domestic violence as non-serious crime.
And the Act has a serious defect in protection of victims from further battering. The victims are often left alone without proper supports while their cases are dealt within the criminal justice system. The prosecutors who deal with the domestic violence cases have a tendency that their decision whether to prosecute depends on the victims' needs. But without proper protection programs, most of battered women are liable to avoid the punishment of their husband, even when they reported to police. In this context the diversion to consultationprogram will have a negative effect to the victims' security.
So the conclusion of this article is that the program 'indictment suspension with referring the offender to the consultation has a high level of danger in deterrence of domestic violence and protection of victims, while there is few merit from this new diversion program.
Although the Domestic Violence Act was legislated in 1997, it has not proven how much the Act contributed to reduce the domestic violence crimes. Many scholars and victim support groups criticize that judicial reaction system of the Act is too weak to deter the serious battering crimes. There are many obstacles in the judicial enforcement, because many people still regard the domestic violence as a lover's quarrel, not as a crime. In this situation the diversion to consultation program bears an obvious danger in accomplishing the aim of the Act, that is, "prevention of domestic violence". That diversion program has an effect that makes people regard the domestic violence as non-serious crime.
And the Act has a serious defect in protection of victims from further battering. The victims are often left alone without proper supports while their cases are dealt within the criminal justice system. The prosecutors who deal with the domestic violence cases have a tendency that their decision whether to prosecute depends on the victims' needs. But without proper protection programs, most of battered women are liable to avoid the punishment of their husband, even when they reported to police. In this context the diversion to consultationprogram will have a negative effect to the victims' security.
So the conclusion of this article is that the program 'indictment suspension with referring the offender to the consultation has a high level of danger in deterrence of domestic violence and protection of victims, while there is few merit from this new diversion program.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 상담조건부 기소유예의 내용
Ⅲ. 가정폭력사건의 처리경향 속에서 본 상담조건부 기소유예의 제도적 기능
Ⅳ. 형사사법의 목적과 기능에서 본 상담조건부 기소유예의 문제점
Ⅴ. 가정폭력에 대한 형사사법의 대응맥락에서 본 상담조건부 기소유예의 문제점
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
소송과정에서의 가정폭력 피해자 보호현황과 쟁점들
형사정책연구
2006 .12
-
가정폭력범죄 대응법률의 실효성 평가
한국공안행정학회보
2018 .01
-
피해자 보호의 관점에서 본 가정폭력 대응과 경찰개입
홍익법학
2018 .01
-
가정폭력 관련 특별법 체계의 개선방향
피해자학연구
2013 .01
-
가정폭력범죄 대응방안에 대한 재고찰
홍익법학
2018 .01
-
가정폭력범죄의 처벌에 관한 특례법 10년의 평가
형사정책연구
2008 .09
-
가정폭력 피해근로자 보호를 위한 안전휴가 제도 도입의 의의와 과제
이화젠더법학
2019 .08
-
가정폭력 피해 아동ㆍ청소년 실태 및 대응방안 연구
한국청소년정책연구원 연구보고서
2014 .12
-
가정폭력범죄에 대한형사사법기관의 대응에 관한비판적 고찰
한국공안행정학회보
2015 .01
-
가정폭력 피해자 보호를 위한 절차개선방안 : 가정폭력전담재판부 도입을 중심으로
이화젠더법학
2018 .12
-
가정폭력 사건에 대한 수사단계의 문제점과 효율적 대응방안
법학논집
2017 .01
-
경찰의 가정폭력피해자 보호에 관한 법제도 연구
법학논총
2019 .05
-
가정폭력처벌법을 통해 본 입법쟁점과 개선방안
이화젠더법학
2019 .08
-
중국의 가정폭력법에 대한 법정책적 검토
법과 정책연구
2006 .06
-
스페인의 가정폭력대응 관련법제․정책의 특징과 시사점
한국공안행정학회보
2015 .01
-
유럽의 가정폭력범죄 대응정책에 관한 검토
피해자학연구
2015 .01
-
가정폭력 특례법의 재고와 사회복지실천의 대안적 방안
한국사회과학연구
2006 .12
-
배우자폭력⋅아동학대 피해자 보호방안 -미국의 Greenbook 정책을 중심으로-
일감법학
2012 .01
-
처벌불원 의사를 드러내는 가정폭력 피해자의 진정성에 대한 실증적 의문 제기
이화젠더법학
2020 .05
-
성폭력 범죄 피해자의 2차 피해 유발요인 분석을 통한 예방책 모색:성폭력 범죄 피해자와 수사 담당자에 대한질적 면담을 중심으로
한국치안행정논집
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003968487