지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제108호
- 발행연도
- 2018.6
- 수록면
- 309 - 344 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2018.06.108.309
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The surname ‘Wang(王),’ which was the last name of the Goryeo royal family, was not only a surname of the founder king Taejo Wang Geon’s direct descendants (the sons), but also the surname of figures who were the descendants of Wang Geon’s ‘daughters.’ Such situation was enabled by the fact that Wang Geon’s male and female descendants continued to marry each other for generations. As a result, this surname itself came to reflect a rather ‘complete’ lineage and a consciousness of such lineage, than a one-sided, patrilineal consciousness.
Documents regarding governmental officials living in the Capital included their ‘Surnames’ by law, but in general the way surnames spreaded throughout the society and were embraced by the people did not feature any particular, for example patrilineal, consciousness in motion. There were no fixed factions established through or represented by a ‘single’ surname in the local Hyang’ri class. Only a handful of local Hyang’ri figures who were bestowed a military rank from the king branded surnames, yet such practice only became a widely popular one later during the Military regime period. These surnames, which had only been cultural and administrative requirements with no particular attachments to either patrilineal or matrilineal relatives, later did become a thing that was inherited to posterior generations through the patrilineal line, only because the political privileges of a society’s senior class (using surnames) were delivered usually from male ancestors to male descendants.
The lineage consciousness of class members using surnames had been generally bilateral in nature, to the extent of the state sometimes ordering an individual to change its original surname to the surname of its mother. The reason that patrilineal relatives enjoyed relatively higher merits in Eumseo(蔭敍) institution was only because ‘father and son’ was the most basic pair in terms of succeeding or inheriting political assets. The Eumseo practice in cases of the meritorious leaders’ descendants was essentially a male-oriented institution by design, but only because such meritorious figures were usually males, and not because it was an institution of a society with a lineage sensibility which differentiated patrilineal and non-patrilineal relatives or viewed the former as more important than the latter. The surnames of the Goryeo period reflected a bilateral, comprehensive lineage consciousness.
Documents regarding governmental officials living in the Capital included their ‘Surnames’ by law, but in general the way surnames spreaded throughout the society and were embraced by the people did not feature any particular, for example patrilineal, consciousness in motion. There were no fixed factions established through or represented by a ‘single’ surname in the local Hyang’ri class. Only a handful of local Hyang’ri figures who were bestowed a military rank from the king branded surnames, yet such practice only became a widely popular one later during the Military regime period. These surnames, which had only been cultural and administrative requirements with no particular attachments to either patrilineal or matrilineal relatives, later did become a thing that was inherited to posterior generations through the patrilineal line, only because the political privileges of a society’s senior class (using surnames) were delivered usually from male ancestors to male descendants.
The lineage consciousness of class members using surnames had been generally bilateral in nature, to the extent of the state sometimes ordering an individual to change its original surname to the surname of its mother. The reason that patrilineal relatives enjoyed relatively higher merits in Eumseo(蔭敍) institution was only because ‘father and son’ was the most basic pair in terms of succeeding or inheriting political assets. The Eumseo practice in cases of the meritorious leaders’ descendants was essentially a male-oriented institution by design, but only because such meritorious figures were usually males, and not because it was an institution of a society with a lineage sensibility which differentiated patrilineal and non-patrilineal relatives or viewed the former as more important than the latter. The surnames of the Goryeo period reflected a bilateral, comprehensive lineage consciousness.
목차
머리말
1. 계층별 성씨 운용
2. 양측적 혈연의식 속 성씨의 기능
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선후기 同姓婚의 실태와 姓貫意識
사학연구
2017 .06
-
소련 초기의 개성에 대한 연구 : 『이즈베스티야』개성(改姓)공고를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2016 .06
-
A Study on the Transformation of the Surname System in Late Chosŏn : The Phenomenon of Surname Acquisition by the Name-less Class
International Journal of Korean History
2016 .02
-
백제 성씨문화의 이해
백제학보
2019 .01
-
고려사의 北方語 성씨 石抹에 대하여
태동고전연구
2018 .01
-
渤日 交流에 등장한 소그드인, 그 경위와 의미
고구려발해연구
2019 .03
-
고대 일본의 씨성 개념과 『신찬성씨록』의 개성
한일관계사연구
2019 .05
-
조선시대 예안 광산김씨의 친족활동 : 계회契會와 성회姓會를 중심으로
국학연구
2016 .08
-
조선후기 忠淸道 公州牧의 有力 姓氏와 향촌 지배세력의 추이 - 『鄕案』,『居接名錄』의 분석을 중심으로
역사와 담론
2019 .10
-
百濟 大姓八族과 東아시아 8姓
동국사학
2022 .08
-
중국사 연구에서 문화적 접경 연구의 필요성 - 중국의 ‘성씨공정(姓氏工程)’에 대한 대응 논리를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2022 .06
-
‘만들어진 전통’으로서의 同姓同本禁婚制와 식민정치
대동문화연구
2016 .01
-
조선전기 친족의식과 동성혼
역사학연구
2020 .01
-
동아시아 여러 나라의 성씨제 정비와 일본의 『신찬성씨록』 - 역주 『신찬성씨록』(동북아역사재단, 2020) 상·중·하 출간에 부쳐
동북아역사논총
2021 .03
-
宋代『紹興十八年同年小錄』에 나오는 本貫의 의미 - 比較史의 觀點에서 한국의 本貫制度를 바라보다 -
사림
2016 .01
-
한글과 한자 이름의 작명 방법에 대한 고찰
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
전북 임실군의 1950년대 유교적 친족관계와 심성 －『삼계일기』를 중심으로－
지방사와 지방문화
2022 .05
-
영주지역 생원 · 진사 입격자와 사회적 지위
국학연구
2018 .03
-
『삼국유사』 속의 人獸 交涉譚 고찰 - 악한 동물의 존재와 그에 대한 대응을 중심으로 -
어문학
2024 .12
-
동성마을의 기념비적 역사와 성씨집단의 대립적 해석
실천민속학연구
2021 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-003164644