지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.12
- 수록면
- 57 - 79 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.18703/silj.2015.12.22.2.57
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One of the core principles of the ICC is that of complementarity. The ICC is only meant to act when domestic authorities fail to take the necessary steps necessary for the investigation and prosecution of the crimes falling under its subject-matter jurisdiction. It is for this reason that at the ICC Review Conference in Kampala, the Assembly of States Parties recognized the ‘primary responsibility of states to investigate and prosecute the most serious crimes of international concern’, also stressing the ‘obligations of States Parties flowing from the Rome Statute’. In light of the crucial importance of states parties’ role for the functioning of the Rome Statute, one cannot overemphasize the necessity for the effective implementation of the Statute within the domestic sphere of the states parties. Hence, there arises the need to adopt effectual legislation for the domestic implementation of the Statute.
In this article, the author conducts a critical analysis of Korea’s implementing legislation of the Rome Statute, the Korean Act on Punishment of the Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (“Korean ICC Act”). The Korean ICC Act closely follows the example of the German Code. This similarity between the German implementing legislation and its Korean counterpart can be accounted for, among others, by the traditional familiarity of the Korean lawyers with the German legal system, including criminal law. The German Code, which reflects its own normative experiences and long-standing state practice, generally takes an active (even aggressive) approach to crimes jure gentium in general, as is demonstrated by its position of largely eliminating the distinction between international and non-international armed conflicts in connection with war crimes. In enacting the Korean ICC Act, whether the Korean legislator was keenly aware of these characteristics peculiar to Germany and calibrated the Korean legislation accordingly is an open question.
Another problem of the Korean ICC Act is the mismatch between the ‘thick’ (even over-) implementation on the substantive side and the highly ‘thin’ implementation on the procedural side. This ‘imbalance’ leads one to raise some questions about Korea’s attitude toward the Rome Statute. Korea played a significant role at the Rome conference and produced a President of the ICC. In order to secure a firmer position in the international community, Korea may need to strengthen and systematize its implementation of the Rome Statute. The author argues that revisiting the Korean ICC Act and devising ways for its improvement, in particular, putting in place more detailed provisions on cooperation with the ICC, should be the first step in that direction.
In this article, the author conducts a critical analysis of Korea’s implementing legislation of the Rome Statute, the Korean Act on Punishment of the Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (“Korean ICC Act”). The Korean ICC Act closely follows the example of the German Code. This similarity between the German implementing legislation and its Korean counterpart can be accounted for, among others, by the traditional familiarity of the Korean lawyers with the German legal system, including criminal law. The German Code, which reflects its own normative experiences and long-standing state practice, generally takes an active (even aggressive) approach to crimes jure gentium in general, as is demonstrated by its position of largely eliminating the distinction between international and non-international armed conflicts in connection with war crimes. In enacting the Korean ICC Act, whether the Korean legislator was keenly aware of these characteristics peculiar to Germany and calibrated the Korean legislation accordingly is an open question.
Another problem of the Korean ICC Act is the mismatch between the ‘thick’ (even over-) implementation on the substantive side and the highly ‘thin’ implementation on the procedural side. This ‘imbalance’ leads one to raise some questions about Korea’s attitude toward the Rome Statute. Korea played a significant role at the Rome conference and produced a President of the ICC. In order to secure a firmer position in the international community, Korea may need to strengthen and systematize its implementation of the Rome Statute. The author argues that revisiting the Korean ICC Act and devising ways for its improvement, in particular, putting in place more detailed provisions on cooperation with the ICC, should be the first step in that direction.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Overview of the Status and Effect of International Treaties within the Korean Legal System
Ⅲ. Domestic Implementation of the Rome Statute in Comparative Perspective
Ⅳ. A Critical Analysis the Korean ICC Act
Ⅴ. Concluding Remarks
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Domestic Implementation of the Rome Statute in Japan
서울국제법연구
2015 .12
-
국제형사재판소 로마규정 비당사국 국가원수의 면제
서울국제법연구
2017 .12
-
지휘관 및 상급자 책임, 사법방해죄에 대한 ICC 확정판결이 국내 법원에 미치는 효력 : ｢국제형사재판소 관할 범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 법률｣ 제7조 적용여부를 중심으로
서울국제법연구
2019 .12
-
반-ICC 담론의 비판적 검토 — ICC는 아프리카만을 겨냥하는 국제형사재판소인가? —
법학논총
2021 .12
-
대학의 기업협업센터(ICC) 운영 현황 및 성과분석에 관한 연구
한국비교정부학보
2023 .03
-
성과와 사례분석을 기반으로 한 기업협업센터(ICC) 발전방안에 관한 연구
한국진로창업경영학회지
2023 .01
-
국제형사재판의 문제점과 과제
형사정책연구
2019 .06
-
한국범죄분류 개발 기초연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
전환기 정의와 국제형사재판소의 역할 - 치유와 회복을 통한 정의, 평화, 인권의 길 -
법조
2023 .02
-
국제형사재판소 공판단계에서의 피해자 절차참가에 관한 소고
국제법학회논총
2023 .06
-
ICC와 전시 환경 범죄
인도법논총
2024 .12
-
국제형사법상 정범 개념의 우리나라 이행법률에의 적용가능성
법학연구
2019 .05
-
국제형사재판소규정 제30조 ‘주관적 요소’에 관한 분석
법학연구
2023 .02
-
국제형사재판소의 최근 위기상황에 관한 연구 - 절차지연 문제를 중심으로 -
국제법학회논총
2019 .12
-
국제형사재판소 관할범죄에 대한 형사사법공조체계의 문제점과 개선방안
비교형사법연구
2016 .01
-
2019년 개정 ICC 중재 진행에 관한 당사자 및 중재판정부 지침의 주요내용과 시사점:ICC의 중재판정부 정보 공개 및 중재판정의발간 정책을 중심으로
중재연구
2019 .01
-
로마규정상 재판적격성 결정기준으로서의 일사부재리 원칙
서울국제법연구
2019 .12
-
로마규정에 따른 ‘사이버’ 침략범죄 - 국제형사재판소의 역할과 도전 -
저스티스
2024 .10
-
집단살해죄 관련 국제형사재판소(ICC)의 법리 분석
법학논집
2016 .12
-
국제형사재판소 관할범죄에 관한 이론 및 사례 연구 - 최근 판례상의 실체법·절차법적 주요 쟁점 중심으로
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-361-002208890