지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 1950, adoption of ‘disregard of the corporate personality’ was discussed in Japan. But, application of such a principle of law was so passive at that time. A lack of basis for recognizing the principle in the range of interpretation theory on positive law was one opinion. The other prevalent opinion was that there was a deep-rooted perception that there is no need to propound the principle because an established principle of law could solve legal disputes.
In these circumstances, the Japanese Supreme Court’s verdict rendered on February 27, 1969 made this principle of law perceived as one of official law principles in Japanese law. The verdict officially declared recognition of the ‘disregard of the corporate personality’ principle. After then, an affirmative theory about the principle has become a mainstream theory, and courts made decisions based on the principle.
The above principle of law is generally applied to Commercial Law and Corporation Law. However, where someone uses the legal form of corporation in Tax Law relation for economic purposes only, this principle of law can be applied in Tax Law for the reason that the legal form of corporation has to be denied when economic entities behind the corporate veil enjoy benefits by using the legal form of corporation.
In Japan, although the principle of ‘disregard of the corporate personality’ can be applied in Tax Law, this principle is not used by taxpayers to avoid taxes. Also, there is no direct precedent that permits taxation based on the principle. And theories on this principle are divided into two: one is active theory which prescribes that the principle has to be counted as same foundation or same realization for Good Faith and Estoppel that are acknowledged as Rechtsquelle because those are inherent logics in Law, and the other is passive theory which prescribes that the principle must be analyzed passively because taxation exceeding the range of Tax Law Relation that exists in society is not allowed under the principle of no taxation without law.
Thus, we can see that theories, application scope under case law and prerequisite for the principle of ‘disregard of the corporate personality’ are formed in Japanese Tax Law. Eventually, this is the way for realizing Fairness of Taxation by preventing abuse of corporation form as means of tax evasion. As Korea has not yet established theories or precedents concerning the principle in Tax Law, this is very suggestive for us.
In these circumstances, the Japanese Supreme Court’s verdict rendered on February 27, 1969 made this principle of law perceived as one of official law principles in Japanese law. The verdict officially declared recognition of the ‘disregard of the corporate personality’ principle. After then, an affirmative theory about the principle has become a mainstream theory, and courts made decisions based on the principle.
The above principle of law is generally applied to Commercial Law and Corporation Law. However, where someone uses the legal form of corporation in Tax Law relation for economic purposes only, this principle of law can be applied in Tax Law for the reason that the legal form of corporation has to be denied when economic entities behind the corporate veil enjoy benefits by using the legal form of corporation.
In Japan, although the principle of ‘disregard of the corporate personality’ can be applied in Tax Law, this principle is not used by taxpayers to avoid taxes. Also, there is no direct precedent that permits taxation based on the principle. And theories on this principle are divided into two: one is active theory which prescribes that the principle has to be counted as same foundation or same realization for Good Faith and Estoppel that are acknowledged as Rechtsquelle because those are inherent logics in Law, and the other is passive theory which prescribes that the principle must be analyzed passively because taxation exceeding the range of Tax Law Relation that exists in society is not allowed under the principle of no taxation without law.
Thus, we can see that theories, application scope under case law and prerequisite for the principle of ‘disregard of the corporate personality’ are formed in Japanese Tax Law. Eventually, this is the way for realizing Fairness of Taxation by preventing abuse of corporation form as means of tax evasion. As Korea has not yet established theories or precedents concerning the principle in Tax Law, this is very suggestive for us.
목차
〈국문초록〉
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일본의 일반적인 법인격부인 법리의 적용
Ⅲ. 일본의 조세법상 법인격부인 법리의 적용
Ⅳ. 요약 및 결론
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국과 중국의 법인격부인 법리의 비교연구
Journal of China Studies
2016 .01
-
프랑스세법상의 조세법률주의
조세법연구
2019 .11
-
일본 세법상의 신의칙에 관한 이론적 고찰-학설과 판례를 중심으로
사법
2018 .01
-
자유경제주의의 조세법원칙 연구
혁신기업연구
2024 .03
-
부가가치세법상 실질과세원칙의 해석론에 관한 연구
조세법연구
2019 .04
-
민법의 일반법적 성질에 기초한 민법개정 제안
안암법학
2015 .01
-
조세정책의 입법적 기초와 한계 - 최근 주택 관련 조세입법을 중심으로 -
조세법연구
2021 .04
-
유리한 신(新) 조건 우선의 원칙
노동법학
2021 .06
-
데이터 법제의 분류체계 정립을 위한 시론적 검토
과학기술과 법
2022 .12
-
조세법률주의와 실질과세의 관계에 관한 연구
경영교육연구
2020 .04
-
헌법상 조세의 기본원칙과 세법상 실질과세
유럽헌법연구
2021 .08
-
상법의 해체와 회사법의 단행법화 등 분리입법에 관한 검토
한양법학
2024 .02
-
세법문법의 정립에 관한 시론적 고찰 -세법용어의 표현문제를 중심으로-
조세논총
2016 .12
-
과세관청의 조세포탈범을 상대로 한 민사상 불법행위 손해배상청구 가부 - 대법원 2021. 10. 28. 선고 2019다293814 판결을 중심으로 -
법학평론
2023 .04
-
Strengthening Clinical Legal Education in Japan: What Should Be Done in the Second Stage of the Law School System?
Journal of Korean Law
2021 .01
-
김정은 시대 북한식 사회주의법치의 의미와 한계- 법의 지배(rule of law)의 일반론적 시각을 중심으로 -
동북아법연구
2019 .01
-
국제적 근로관계에 관한 준거법 결정에 대한 시론
노동법포럼
2017 .07
-
과세요건이 사실행위인 경우 조세법상 실질과세 원칙의 적용문제
한양법학
2017 .05
-
세법상의 실질과세원칙에 있어서의 실질에 관한 연구- 세법적실질의 남용에 대한 해결을 중심으로 -
세무학연구
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002060102