메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Kim Youngshin (계명대학교)
저널정보
한국번역학회 번역학연구 번역학연구 제8권 제2호
발행연도
2007.9
수록면
241 - 257 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to illuminate the differences of communicative preferences between Korean and English, especially with regard to the subject. In order to talk about such differences, we draw on the concept of thematic roles such as AGENT, THEME/PATIENT, INSTRUMENT and LOCATION from sentence semantics. One of the important findings with regard to thematic roles is that the preference pattern for the subject position varies with different languages. Such a finding serves as an important starting point from which to pursue the present study.
First, with the translation of English into Korean, this study has demonstrated that non-animate ACTOR subjects are demoted to something other than subjects, usually denoting the cause of the event. At the same time, personal pronouns such as 'I', 'We', and 'You' aimed at creating personal involvement between the author and readers are generally omitted in the Korean translations. We argue that such a shift is aimed at enhancing naturalness and readability of the Korean TTs.
Second, in regard to translation of Korean into English. we have found the opposite phenomenon in which the noun in the adverbial phrases is promoted into the subject position. Such a promotion of Non-ACTORs into the subject position presents a striking contrast to the dem otion of Actors in the translation of English into Korean.
Seeking to incorporate such findings into the translator training, the pre sent paper suggests that the teacher should inform students of such differences and encourage them to seek various way to convey the given meaning.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
3. Data
4. Analysis
5. Conclusion
References
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-701-004327809