지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this paper is to examine the presentation of speech and thought proposed by Leech and Short, to compare and analyze the source and the target text of Diary of a Vagabond on the framework of their presentation, and to discuss problems which narration shift between ST and TT may imply.
The style of Diary of a Vagabond is striking, especially narration, the representation of character speech and/or character thought. But the stylistic effects of the ST usually disappear in the TT, for Free Direct Discourse and Free Indirect Discourse are changed into Direct Discourse (the norm for speech) and Indirect Discourse (the norm for thought). Free Direct forms are the removal of quotation marks or reporting clauses which accompany Direct forms. Free Direct Speech evokes the effect of vividness and speed, and Free Direct Thought evokes ‘stream of consciousness,’ ‘interior monologue.’ Free Indirect forms are ‘free’ in that it has no reporting clause, and indirect in that a character’s voice is filtered through the narrator’s viewpoint: this interweaving is ‘dual voice.’
Following English norms rather than unique narration styles in the ST may imply three problems: the failure to capture the meaning of the ST; the loss of identity of Diary of a Vagabond as a Korean literature; lowering the status of a translator.
The style of Diary of a Vagabond is striking, especially narration, the representation of character speech and/or character thought. But the stylistic effects of the ST usually disappear in the TT, for Free Direct Discourse and Free Indirect Discourse are changed into Direct Discourse (the norm for speech) and Indirect Discourse (the norm for thought). Free Direct forms are the removal of quotation marks or reporting clauses which accompany Direct forms. Free Direct Speech evokes the effect of vividness and speed, and Free Direct Thought evokes ‘stream of consciousness,’ ‘interior monologue.’ Free Indirect forms are ‘free’ in that it has no reporting clause, and indirect in that a character’s voice is filtered through the narrator’s viewpoint: this interweaving is ‘dual voice.’
Following English norms rather than unique narration styles in the ST may imply three problems: the failure to capture the meaning of the ST; the loss of identity of Diary of a Vagabond as a Korean literature; lowering the status of a translator.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 다양한 서술 방식
3. 『부랑일기』에 나타난 서술의 다양성 분석
4. 분석결과 및 논의
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-701-004179214