지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims at looking the roles and activities of the related parties in the legislative process of the labor Acts to protect on working hours and non-regular workers, such as fixed-term and part time workers, dispatched workers.
To look at the above, this study mainly focused on the conditions, the structure and strategies, the results of the bargaining process of the Acts, based on the bargaining theory.
Relating to the conditions, the main issues and bargaining parties have been changed during the deliberation of the acts. In relation to the structure of the bargaining, the committee members had the initiative to negotiate one another compared to the old days when the committee members tried to abide by the orders and guidelines of the central party. Each party had the posture to attain its own interest as a usual in the begaining but changed its original position based on the issues. Each party deliberated the Acts without throughly reviewing the impacts of the acts in advance.
Policy implications are as follows: The committee members as the negotiating parties bargained the acts with considerable autonomy compared to the past. This means the legislature played an important role in resolving the conflict of the society through democratic procedure. In addition, the different environment and legislative structure of the deliberation process influenced the legislative members and the contents of the acts. As a result, the acts were modified to be favorable for the labor union circles compared to the original version. To further more consensus-based result in the legislative process, it is desirable for the committee to introduce tripatite negotiation system based on voluntray participation of the related parties before the authoritative rule making. In addition, in the process of the authoritative rule making, the committee has to try to filter diverse point of view of the parties instead of depending on mere majority rule making
To look at the above, this study mainly focused on the conditions, the structure and strategies, the results of the bargaining process of the Acts, based on the bargaining theory.
Relating to the conditions, the main issues and bargaining parties have been changed during the deliberation of the acts. In relation to the structure of the bargaining, the committee members had the initiative to negotiate one another compared to the old days when the committee members tried to abide by the orders and guidelines of the central party. Each party had the posture to attain its own interest as a usual in the begaining but changed its original position based on the issues. Each party deliberated the Acts without throughly reviewing the impacts of the acts in advance.
Policy implications are as follows: The committee members as the negotiating parties bargained the acts with considerable autonomy compared to the past. This means the legislature played an important role in resolving the conflict of the society through democratic procedure. In addition, the different environment and legislative structure of the deliberation process influenced the legislative members and the contents of the acts. As a result, the acts were modified to be favorable for the labor union circles compared to the original version. To further more consensus-based result in the legislative process, it is desirable for the committee to introduce tripatite negotiation system based on voluntray participation of the related parties before the authoritative rule making. In addition, in the process of the authoritative rule making, the committee has to try to filter diverse point of view of the parties instead of depending on mere majority rule making
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 근로기준법 중 개정 법률안의 분석
Ⅲ. 비정규직 관련 법률안의 분석
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
노동입법의 국회심사과정에서 참여자의 협상행태와 시사점
한국사회정책
2008 .12
-
교섭창구단일화제도 시행에 따른 법적·실무적 쟁점
노동법학
2011 .09
-
노동법상 사용자 적격성에 대한 검토 - 학교부문을 중심으로 -
원광법학
2012 .01
-
정당의 공직선거후보자 추천에 관한 법정책적 고찰
법과 정책연구
2020 .01
-
교섭단위분리제도의 실제적 운영과 법적 과제 - 부산지방노동위원회 2015. 6. 17. 2015단위19 현대중공업 교섭단위 분리 결정 -
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
교섭단위의 분리에 관한 법적 쟁점의 고찰
노동법학
2012 .09
-
업체탐방-(주)ACTS
프린팅코리아
2002 .01
-
교섭대표노조 결정 과정에서의 쟁점 - 1. 교섭창구단일화 절차 규정의 강행규범성, 2. 교섭창구단일화를 거치지 않고 단체협약을 체결한 경우 체결 노동조합의 지위-
노동법포럼
2015 .02
-
‘자율교섭’과 ‘교섭단위분리’에 관한 법적 쟁점
노동법학
2012 .03
-
노동위원회의 교섭창구단일화 관련 결정 절차상의 법적쟁점
노동법포럼
2012 .04
-
일본 노동심판제도의 운영상의 과정과 문제점
노동법연구
2009 .09
-
의료분쟁조정법안(약칭)의 민사법적 고찰
의료법학
2010 .01
-
교원노조의 단체교섭 구조 개선에 관한 연구 (사용자측 교섭당사자를 중심으로)
노동법포럼
2010 .04
-
교섭단위의 결정법리와 교섭단위의 확대
노동법포럼
2019 .07
-
교섭단위 분리 제도의 법적 쟁점
노동법포럼
2018 .02
-
기업별 복수노조와 교섭창구의 단일화
노동법학
2005 .12
-
복수노조 교섭창구단일화 제도의 주요 쟁점
아주법학
2010 .01
-
간접고용과 교섭창구단일화 절차 - 사업 또는 사업장 교섭단위의 적용을 중심으로 -
노동법학
2020 .03
-
‘2018 행정부교섭’의 법적·실무상 쟁점 - 교섭창구 단일화, 지부교섭 위임, 절차합의서 등을 중심으로 -
법학연구
2019 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0