메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
손향미 (삼정노무법인)
저널정보
한국노동법학회 노동법학 노동법학 제39호
발행연도
2011.9
수록면
1 - 38 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Regarding the transitional measures of article 4 of Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act Addendum, the meaning of ‘on the enforcement date of this Act’ is still under argument in the judgment by the Ministry of Employment and Labor and the Court. Not only that but article 4 of the Addendum also includes the problem that it cannot explain the ground of granting a labor union that did not go through the procedure of bargaining channel unification with the position as bargaining representative union by giving the position as bargaining representative union to a labor union which was in the bargaining process on the date this Act was enforced and the authenticity of causing to restrict the execution of other labor union"s bargaining right.
In particular, granting the position as bargaining representative union only based on the fact that the union was in the process of bargaining on the date of the Act enforcement causes such result to excessively restrict the exercise of the bargaining right of labor unions newly established after July 1, 2011 or other labor unions which were not in the bargaining process at the time of the Act enforcement, and involves the potential to ultimately cause the dispute of unconstitutionality again. Therefore, a review must be done within earliest day possible on the granting of a labor union which was already in bargaining process before enforcement of the Act already with the position as bargaining representative union.
Various disputes are arising with regard to the specific procedure of channel unification. Nevertheless, the system of unifying the channel on Labor Union Act still remnant problem on the interpretation and operation for cases where the channel unification procedure rule on Labor Union Act and labor-management autonomy collide. The interpretation and future improvement direction may vary depending on what shall be emphasized. Nevertheless, whatever the case may be, the interpretation needs be in such a way that the procedure of channel unification on Labor Union Act shall not infiltrate the exercise of bargaining right of labor unions other than bargaining representative union nor the essence of labor management autonomy excessively, and institutional improvement requires to be made on it.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 부칙 제4조(교섭 중인 노동조합에 관한 경과조치)와 교섭창구단일화
Ⅲ. 교섭창구단일화 절차상의 법적?실무적 문제점
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (4)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-336-001035783