지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 노동법이론실무학회 노동법포럼 노동법포럼 제38호
- 발행연도
- 2023.3
- 수록면
- 189 - 224 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.46329/LLF.2023.03.38.189
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In Korea, where enterprise-specific trade unions have been prevalent, the matter of whether non-employed members of a trade union have the right to access the workplace where the union is established has not been a prominent issue. Nonetheless, within an industry-specific trade union, workers across various workplaces collaborate on union activities. Therefore, members who do not belong to a particular company must enter the premises of a company to which they are not affiliated to participate in the industrial union’s activities at its workplace. Moreover, both enterprise-specific and industrial unions must provide their members with essential information, necessitating the access of union officials to the workplace. This prerequisite must be fulfilled for the exercise of such rights.
Of course, this right of access needs to be limited to some extent in order to harmonize with employers" ownership rights, but it is difficult to see how the right of access to individual workplaces of industry-specific labor unions should be prohibited simply because they are not employees of a particular company. Rather, it is necessary to start from the recognition that access to individual workplaces by trade union officials is necessary for the members of the trade union to receive adequate protection from the trade union.
The Trade Union And Labor Relations Adjustment Act of 2021, as revised by Article 5(2), stipulates that a member of a trade union who is not a worker engaged in a business or at a place of business (hereinafter referred to as "employed worker") may conduct activities of the trade union within the business or place of business to the extent that does not impede the efficient business operation of the employer.
The determination of what constitutes ‘not impeding the efficient business operation of the employer’ will depend on the specific circumstances of the case, while considering the appropriate balance between the necessity of accessing the workplace for union activities and the employer"s interest in conducting its business without undue interference. In general, the purpose of the non-employee members" access, the scope of the area to be accessed, and the number of non-employee members seeking to enter the workplace should be taken into account.
Of course, this right of access needs to be limited to some extent in order to harmonize with employers" ownership rights, but it is difficult to see how the right of access to individual workplaces of industry-specific labor unions should be prohibited simply because they are not employees of a particular company. Rather, it is necessary to start from the recognition that access to individual workplaces by trade union officials is necessary for the members of the trade union to receive adequate protection from the trade union.
The Trade Union And Labor Relations Adjustment Act of 2021, as revised by Article 5(2), stipulates that a member of a trade union who is not a worker engaged in a business or at a place of business (hereinafter referred to as "employed worker") may conduct activities of the trade union within the business or place of business to the extent that does not impede the efficient business operation of the employer.
The determination of what constitutes ‘not impeding the efficient business operation of the employer’ will depend on the specific circumstances of the case, while considering the appropriate balance between the necessity of accessing the workplace for union activities and the employer"s interest in conducting its business without undue interference. In general, the purpose of the non-employee members" access, the scope of the area to be accessed, and the number of non-employee members seeking to enter the workplace should be taken into account.
목차
[대상판결①] 대법원 2020. 7. 9. 선고 2015도6173 판결
[대상판결②] 대법원 2020. 7. 29. 선고 2017도2478 판결
[評釋]
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
산별노조 임원 등 조합원의 개별 사업장 출입에 관한 법적 문제
노동법학
2019 .12
-
개정 노조법의 주요 내용과 쟁점
노동법학
2021 .06
-
비종사 조합원의 사업장에서의 노동조합활동의 의미와 한계 - 대상판결: 대법원 2022.10.14., 선고 2022두48288 판결 -
노동법논총
2023 .04
-
비종사 조합원의 사업장 내 노조활동에 관한 고찰
법학연구
2021 .06
-
단결선택권과 단결하지 아니할 자유를 고려한 단결강제 제도의 모색
노동법학
2020 .03
-
ILO ‘결사의 자유’ 핵심협약 관련 노조법상의 쟁점 해결 방안 : 단결권에 관한 사항을 중심으로
노동법학
2018 .12
-
우리나라 노동조합이 여성근로자의 임금에미치는 영향
노동경제논집
2016 .09
-
정규직 노조의 비정규직 조직화 경험 사례연구 - 성공과 실패 요인 분석을 중심으로 -
노동연구
2019 .06
-
교원노조법 제2조의 합헌 판단에 대한 비판적 검토 : 대상결정 : 2015. 5. 28. 2013헌마671, 2014헌가21(병합)
노동법학
2015 .09
-
산별노조 지부의 법적 지위
노동법논총
2017 .04
-
복수노동조합 하의 유니언숍협정의 해석론과 과제
노동법논총
2016 .08
-
조직형태 변경 절차의 주체로서 노동조합의 개념에 관한 해석론 : ‘독일에서의 단결체 개념을 중심으로’
노동법논총
2015 .04
-
노동조합법상 근로자 개념 확대와 그 후속문제에 대한 단상
노동법학
2019 .12
-
Union Characteristics and its Impact on Absenteeism in the Context of Metal Industry in South Korea
East Asian Journal of Business Economics
2019 .01
-
Union Characteristics and its Impact on Absenteeism in the Context of Metal Industry in South Korea
East Asian Journal of Business Economics
2019 .01
-
금속산업에서의 노조민주주의가 노사관계 성과에 미치는 효과 : 인사고용정책에 대한 노조개입의 매개효과
산업관계연구
2015 .03
-
자영노동자의 노동조합 의식 연구: 임금노동자성의 영향을 중심으로
산업노동연구
2021 .10
-
노동조합법상 근로자를 판단하는 판례의 기준
노동법학
2019 .12
-
노동조합의 활성화 정도와 노사협력이 고령자고용률에 미치는 영향
기업경영연구
2015 .01
-
노동조합 설립신고제도의 개선방안 - ILO 협약 비준과 교섭창구 단일화제도와의 정합성을 중심으로 -
노동법논총
2019 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-360-000418089