메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
방준식 (영산대학교)
저널정보
노동법이론실무학회 노동법포럼 노동법포럼 제38호
발행연도
2023.3
수록면
1 - 23 (23page)
DOI
10.46329/LLF.2023.03.38.1

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The subject of an unfair labor practice remedy application is not only the workers and trade unions whose rights are directly violated by the employer, but also the specific labor union whose rights are indirectly infringed by the employer"s unfair labor practice against the workers and unions. You can be the subject of a claim for relief in your name. Furthermore, even in the case of plural unions, the unfair labor practice of the bargaining representative union against minority unions must be acknowledged. Therefore, in the relationship between the minority union and the bargaining representative union, the minority union can be the subject of the unfair labor practice remedy request, and the bargaining representative union can be the counterparty of the unfair labor practice remedy order. Also, in the case of non-legal unions, if they have autonomy and democracy, they should be able to apply for remedy for unfair labor practices. It"s just that there is no certificate of establishment, and if it is a labor union guaranteed by the constitution, there is no reason to exclude it from the application for relief.
On the other hand, the employer, the counterparty of the unfair labor practice remedy order, includes not only the legal party, the business owner, but also the business management manager or business manager, who is the actual actor. This is because the effectiveness of the remedy order can be secured while quickly prohibiting the actual unfair labor practice to the person in charge of business management or business manager other than the business owner by expanding the counterparty to comply with the remedy order to prohibit unfair labor practice inside the company. And in relation to the violation of the duty of fair representation in the process of unifying the bargaining channels, it is necessary to legislatively recognize unfair labor practices of the bargaining representative union in addition to unfair labor practices caused by employer domination and intervention. This is because it is necessary to eradicate the violation of the duty of fair representation by the negotiating representative union, which actually occurs against minority unions, through the unfair labor practice system.

목차

Ⅰ. 사실관계 및 판결요지
Ⅱ. 쟁점의 제시
Ⅲ. 부당노동행위 구제제도의 의의
Ⅳ. 사용자 개념의 기업 내부적 확장
Ⅴ. 부당노동행위 구제신청의 주체와 구제명령의 상대방인 사용자
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-360-000418049