개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Sickness is a serious social danger that impacts the livelihoods of individuals, including with the ability to earn an income as well as depriving families of stable lives and causing pain in the body.
To prevent this, the ILO provided specific criteria for the sickness benefit system in the conventions and recommendation. Most OECD countries have adopted the sickness benefit schemes, but our society is not yet introducing it. As a model, the main contents of the sickness benefit system in France and Sweden are as follows.
In France, health insurance is responsible for sickness benefits. As a qualification, it confirms the contributions to health insurance along with the length of employment. It has special exceptions for long-term illnesses and admits overlapping benefits with other social security benefits. Furthermore, the company dispends the employee supplementary benefits to take care of income other than sickness benefits.
In Sweden, the sickness benefit is paid according to the degree of loss of labor capacity and not unemployment. Parental-leave benefit is added to the sickness benefit for childcare. A dedicated manager exists to assist ill employees, and the company helps them quickly by giving them the sickness pay which saves on finances prior to the social insurance’s sickness benefit.
In comparison, the legislation bills proposed in the past have been to establish a paid sick leave in the Labor Standards Act or to create ickness benefit in the employment insurance. However, the former has the disadvantage that it does not cope with long-term disease; the latter does not include the self-employed.
Therefore, this paper proposes health insurance as the sickness benefit system to cover all people and suggests that anyone who contributes to health insurance is paid by the sickness benefit not according to the length of employment such as the employment insurance. The benefits duration is 6 months and can be received up to 1 year. Benefits are 50% of ordinary wages, but increase with the number of dependents.
To prevent this, the ILO provided specific criteria for the sickness benefit system in the conventions and recommendation. Most OECD countries have adopted the sickness benefit schemes, but our society is not yet introducing it. As a model, the main contents of the sickness benefit system in France and Sweden are as follows.
In France, health insurance is responsible for sickness benefits. As a qualification, it confirms the contributions to health insurance along with the length of employment. It has special exceptions for long-term illnesses and admits overlapping benefits with other social security benefits. Furthermore, the company dispends the employee supplementary benefits to take care of income other than sickness benefits.
In Sweden, the sickness benefit is paid according to the degree of loss of labor capacity and not unemployment. Parental-leave benefit is added to the sickness benefit for childcare. A dedicated manager exists to assist ill employees, and the company helps them quickly by giving them the sickness pay which saves on finances prior to the social insurance’s sickness benefit.
In comparison, the legislation bills proposed in the past have been to establish a paid sick leave in the Labor Standards Act or to create ickness benefit in the employment insurance. However, the former has the disadvantage that it does not cope with long-term disease; the latter does not include the self-employed.
Therefore, this paper proposes health insurance as the sickness benefit system to cover all people and suggests that anyone who contributes to health insurance is paid by the sickness benefit not according to the length of employment such as the employment insurance. The benefits duration is 6 months and can be received up to 1 year. Benefits are 50% of ordinary wages, but increase with the number of dependents.
목차
Ⅰ. 상병급여제도의 필요성
Ⅱ. ILO의 상병급여제도 내용
Ⅲ. 프랑스의 상병급여제도 내용
Ⅳ. 스웨덴의 상병급여제도 내용
Ⅴ. 상병급여제도의 도입방안
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
상병급여제도에 관한 소고
사회보장법연구
2016 .06
-
한국 상병수당제도 및 전달체계 설계연구: 주요 선진국과의 제도 비교를 중심으로
보건행정학회지
2019 .01
-
일본의 상병수당 제도와 쟁점에 관한 연구 – 최근 개정과 코로나19 관련 대응을 중심으로 –
사회보장법학
2022 .06
-
질병보험에 대한 보험계약법적 연구
아주법학
2017 .08
-
국민건강보험 맞춤형 코호트 DB를 이용한 한국의 상병수당 및 유급병가를 위한 소요재정추계
보건경제와 정책연구
2019 .01
-
아픈 노동자는 왜 가난해지는가? : 아픈 노동자의 빈곤화과정과 소득보장제의 경험
한국사회정책
2017 .12
-
해외 산재보험 휴업급여와 상병수당 제도 비교 분석
사회보장연구
2021 .08
-
법정 병가제도 도입의 정책적 쟁점
한양법학
2021 .05
-
우리나라 상병수당제도 도입을 위한 비교법적 고찰 - 독일 질병수당과의 비교를 중심으로 -
법과 정책연구
2022 .12
-
Tracking motion sickness by symptoms during dynamic VR environments with EDA signals
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2023 .05
-
병가제도의 국제기준과 해외사례에 관한 소고
사회법연구
2024 .04
-
한국형 상병수당 제도 설계를 위한 급여보장방식 국가비교 및 급여기준 소득분석
사회보장연구
2022 .08
-
『無門關』에 나타난 炳痛에 關한 考察
한국교수불자연합학회지
2017 .01
-
외국의 아픈 노동자는 회사로부터 어떤 지원을 받는가? : 상병수당이 없는 미국, 스위스, 이스라엘의 공적 규제 연구
한국사회정책
2019 .03
-
프리젠티즘의 연구 동향 분석과 실무적 시사점
경영경제연구
2017 .08
-
재물보험 및 배상책임보험에서의 실제 보험사기 유형과 보험사의 대응방안에 관한 연구
법과정책
2024 .03
-
국민건강보험 급여제한에 대한 연구 - 민영보험과의 관계를 중심으로 -
동북아법연구
2015 .01
-
자영업자 고용보험의 문제점과 개선방안 연구
질서경제저널
2021 .01
-
1976년 의료보험법 : 낮은 수준의 보편적 평등의 기원
사회보장법학
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0