메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국세계지역학회 세계지역연구논총 세계지역연구논총 제26권 제2호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
5 - 27 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Arendt had lived her life as a pariah, while rejecting the submission to the conformism, the political evil. Havel has tried to live within truth against living in lie. Their political thinking started commonly from the lived experience as the stateless or the oppressed. Their passionate and disinterested attitude toward the humanity, therefore, underlines their political thinking in common. They clearly emphasize the differences between the traditional and genuine politics. Their end is to reconstitute the public sphere or parallel polis, the genuine politics which can guarantee the freedom and responsibility. Their theories of public realm are somehow different on the ontological and institutional levels. In spite of some differences, they realize in common that these realms contribute to getting the political freedom. As regards with the way to getting the freedom, it seems to me that they raise the different position; Arendt emphasizes the interrelations between politics and ethics; Havel raises the politics above the moral. But their concept of politics is commonly republican. The spontaneity and solidarity as the principle of political action contribute to humanizing the common world. The concern with the common world is connected with the responsibility. The responsibility as a kind of political action is interrelated with the protection of freedom of individual and society. This is the actualization of Amor Mundi and living in truth, which is based on conscience.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0