지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Committee on the Amendment of Korean Civil Law, which is affiliated to the Ministry of Justice, announced in June 2010 the draft bill to amend the Juristic Persons System of the Korean Civil Code. One of the most important changes in the draft bill of 2010 is the introduction of the approbation system into the incorporation of a non-profit juristic person. Currently, a non-profit association may be formed as a juristic person subject to the authorization of the competent authorities. The draft bill of 2010 proposes that a non-profit organization be formed as a juristic person only subject to the approbation of the competent authorities.
The Korean Civil Code § 39 provides that an association which aims at profit-making may be a juristic person in accordance with the conditions prescribed for the formation of trading companies. This section should be abolished, because a profit-making association currently may be formed as a business company with a juristic personality according to the Korean Commercial Code.
The draft bill of 2010 introduces a new § 39-2, which provides that most provisions for a juristic person should apply to an association without juristic personality. While the new section offers a different type of business entity, entrepreneurs would not select this business entity due to its legal uncertainty.
Representative authorities of directors may be restricted only by the articles of incorporation under the draft bill of 2010. The ‘restriction’ placed on the representative authorities seems to refer to the restriction of ‘an extent’ as well as of ‘a manner’ of the power of representation.
Under the current § 60 of the Korean Civil Code, if any restriction placed on the power of representation of any director is not registered, such restriction cannot be set up against a third person despite his acting in bad faith. Protecting a third person acting in bad faith, however, is not consistent with the core principle of Civil Law. Thus, § 60 should be amended in accordance with § 37 of the Korean Commercial Code, which provides that matters as required to be registered shall not be effective as to any third person acting in good faith without registering them.
The draft bill of 2010 newly adopts the system of mergers and divisions of non-profit juristic persons. Most provisions concerning mergers and divisions seem to refer to the ones of the Korean Commercial Code, which shows the tendency of ‘commercialization of civil law.’
The Korean Civil Code § 39 provides that an association which aims at profit-making may be a juristic person in accordance with the conditions prescribed for the formation of trading companies. This section should be abolished, because a profit-making association currently may be formed as a business company with a juristic personality according to the Korean Commercial Code.
The draft bill of 2010 introduces a new § 39-2, which provides that most provisions for a juristic person should apply to an association without juristic personality. While the new section offers a different type of business entity, entrepreneurs would not select this business entity due to its legal uncertainty.
Representative authorities of directors may be restricted only by the articles of incorporation under the draft bill of 2010. The ‘restriction’ placed on the representative authorities seems to refer to the restriction of ‘an extent’ as well as of ‘a manner’ of the power of representation.
Under the current § 60 of the Korean Civil Code, if any restriction placed on the power of representation of any director is not registered, such restriction cannot be set up against a third person despite his acting in bad faith. Protecting a third person acting in bad faith, however, is not consistent with the core principle of Civil Law. Thus, § 60 should be amended in accordance with § 37 of the Korean Commercial Code, which provides that matters as required to be registered shall not be effective as to any third person acting in good faith without registering them.
The draft bill of 2010 newly adopts the system of mergers and divisions of non-profit juristic persons. Most provisions concerning mergers and divisions seem to refer to the ones of the Korean Commercial Code, which shows the tendency of ‘commercialization of civil law.’
#법인설립
#인가주의
#비법인사단
#영리비법인사단
#이사의 대표권 제한
#비영리법인의 합병·분할
#Incorporation of Juristic Person
#Approbation System
#Association without Juristic Personality
#Profit-making Association without Juristic Personality
#Restrictions on the Representative Power of Directors
#Mergers and Divisions of Non-profit Juristic Persons
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 비영리법인의 인가 및 설립요건에 관한 규정
Ⅲ. 영리법인 및 비법인사단에 관한 규정
Ⅳ. 이사의 대표권에 관한 규정
Ⅴ. 법인의 합병 및 분할에 관한 규정
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강태성 / 2007 / 민법총칙편 제3장(법인) 제1절(총칙)과 제2절(설립)에 관한 개정방향 / 민사법학 (35) : 3 ~ 40
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강태성 / 2001 / 법인에 관한 민법개정방향 / 법조 538
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강태성 / 2008 / 사원총회에 관한 민법총칙의 개정방향 / 법조 57 (5) : 5 ~ 38
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김교창 / 2007 / 민법 중 법인의 장에 관한 개정의견 / 인권과 정의 373
5. [학술대회논문] - 김대정 / 2010 / “법인에 관한 민법개정위원회의 개정시안”, ｢민법개정의 방향｣ / 한국민사법학회 2010년 하계학술대회 발표논문
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강태성 / 2001 / 법인에 관한 민법개정방향 / 법조 538
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강태성 / 2008 / 사원총회에 관한 민법총칙의 개정방향 / 법조 57 (5) : 5 ~ 38
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김교창 / 2007 / 민법 중 법인의 장에 관한 개정의견 / 인권과 정의 373
5. [학술대회논문] - 김대정 / 2010 / “법인에 관한 민법개정위원회의 개정시안”, ｢민법개정의 방향｣ / 한국민사법학회 2010년 하계학술대회 발표논문
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
보증보험계약의 당사자 확정 : 대판 1995.9.29, 94다4912의 비판을 중심으로
기업법연구
2007 .09
-
판례에 나타난 비법인사단의 유형 및 규율에 관한 입법론
동아법학
2016 .05
-
‘종교법인법’ 제정에 관한 시론
아주법학
2016 .01
-
법인·단체법의 변천과 과제
법과기업연구
2018 .08
-
사립대학 학교법인의 해산과 잔여재산의 귀속
행정법연구
2018 .11
-
주택임차인이 법인인 경우의 대항력과 우선변제력 - 중소기업 법인을 중심으로 -
재산법연구
2016 .01
-
法人아닌 社團 및 財團에 대한 새로운 理解
법학연구
2007 .08
-
试论债务免除的法律性质
중국법연구
2010 .01
-
總有에 관한 規定의 立法論
사회과학연구
2012 .12
-
비영리법인 성립요건으로서 비영리성
법과 정책연구
2004 .12
-
同盟條約에 關한 法的考察
국제법학회논총
1957 .02
-
정부의 2014년 민법개정안 제32조에 대한 비판적 검토
재산법연구
2015 .01
-
불공정한 법률행위에 관한 연구 : 부동산매매계액에 관한 판례를 중심으로
법학연구
2007 .11
-
법률행위가 민법 제103조에 의하여 무효인 경우에 있어서의 급여자의 반환청구 여부
비교사법
2005 .09
-
非法人社團의 總有物의 管理·處分行爲 및 保存行爲에 관한 一考察
재산법연구
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001270715