개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Although the struggles amongst Goguryeo, Baekje, and Shilla ended in a victory for Shilla, as Allied forces of Shilla and Tang collapsed the former two kingdoms, there still remain two questions. First question is why there were a rupture and a war between Shilla and Tang after the falls of Baekje and Goguryeo. And the second one is why the Goguryeo people's revival movement resulted in the foundation of Balhae, while the Baekje people failed to revive their own.
To answer these two questions, certain aspects of the Tang's policy to rule old territories of Baekje and Goguryeo should be examined. And examination shows us that Tang's control over Baekje's old territory was more severe than that over Goguryeo's. In addition, Shilla as well had a different attitude toward the two regions. Shilla concentrated more on Baekje, in terms of the size of stationary troops or the victims(prisoners) of the unification war.
This kind of difference resulted from the precondition of the alliance arranged between Shilla and Tang. They were to gain the old territories of Baekje and Goguryeo respectively. Tang installed the Andong Protectorate after Goguryeo's fall and even built the Ungjin Areal Command in the old territory of Baekje. By doing so Tang intended to establish a world order centering on Tang China. However, Shilla was very much frustrated by Tang's actions and supported the revival movement of the Goguryeo refugees.
The countermeasures of not only Baekje and Goguryeo refugees but also Shilla against Tang's eastern policy can be summarized as follow. The revival movement of Baekje refugees was facing serious difficulties as the common goal to collapse Goguryeo still remained between Shilla and Tang. Therefore, the refugees of Baekje had no choice but to revive the Baekje kingdom by joining the Ungjin Areal Command. Meanwhile, the revival movement of Goguryeo was developed differently. Goguryeo refugees' revival movement which proceeded in the south area of the Ab'rok-gang river had helps from Shilla. Shilla's support stimulated the Andong Protectorate, and the revival movement of Goguryeo in Liaodong area resulted in the foundation of Balhae.
These two historical events, the installation of the Ungjin Areal Command and the foundation of Balhae, were the results of different choices made by Baekje and Goguryeo refugees against the Chinese-centric world order; the former accepted it, the latter rejected it. On the contrary, Shilla took the position of rivalry, while taking advantage of Tang's political attitude. Shilla rationalized its occupation over the old territory of Baekje by claiming that the world order with Tang at the center would not be possible if Shilla and the Ungjin Areal Command were separated. And Shilla invested Anseung as the king of Goguryeo in the same context. Shilla was in a position to demand its share for the old territory of Goguryeo. Shilla's attitude was part of its strategies to save itself while accepting the world order centered upon Tang China.
To answer these two questions, certain aspects of the Tang's policy to rule old territories of Baekje and Goguryeo should be examined. And examination shows us that Tang's control over Baekje's old territory was more severe than that over Goguryeo's. In addition, Shilla as well had a different attitude toward the two regions. Shilla concentrated more on Baekje, in terms of the size of stationary troops or the victims(prisoners) of the unification war.
This kind of difference resulted from the precondition of the alliance arranged between Shilla and Tang. They were to gain the old territories of Baekje and Goguryeo respectively. Tang installed the Andong Protectorate after Goguryeo's fall and even built the Ungjin Areal Command in the old territory of Baekje. By doing so Tang intended to establish a world order centering on Tang China. However, Shilla was very much frustrated by Tang's actions and supported the revival movement of the Goguryeo refugees.
The countermeasures of not only Baekje and Goguryeo refugees but also Shilla against Tang's eastern policy can be summarized as follow. The revival movement of Baekje refugees was facing serious difficulties as the common goal to collapse Goguryeo still remained between Shilla and Tang. Therefore, the refugees of Baekje had no choice but to revive the Baekje kingdom by joining the Ungjin Areal Command. Meanwhile, the revival movement of Goguryeo was developed differently. Goguryeo refugees' revival movement which proceeded in the south area of the Ab'rok-gang river had helps from Shilla. Shilla's support stimulated the Andong Protectorate, and the revival movement of Goguryeo in Liaodong area resulted in the foundation of Balhae.
These two historical events, the installation of the Ungjin Areal Command and the foundation of Balhae, were the results of different choices made by Baekje and Goguryeo refugees against the Chinese-centric world order; the former accepted it, the latter rejected it. On the contrary, Shilla took the position of rivalry, while taking advantage of Tang's political attitude. Shilla rationalized its occupation over the old territory of Baekje by claiming that the world order with Tang at the center would not be possible if Shilla and the Ungjin Areal Command were separated. And Shilla invested Anseung as the king of Goguryeo in the same context. Shilla was in a position to demand its share for the old territory of Goguryeo. Shilla's attitude was part of its strategies to save itself while accepting the world order centered upon Tang China.
목차
머리말
1. 백제도호부의 설치(660)와 웅진도독부로의 전환(665)
2. 안동도호부의 설치(668)와 웅진도독부의 폐지(671)
3. 안동도호부의 이전(676)과 폐지(698)
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
5세기 중후반 백제의 대외관계
역사와현실
2007 .03
-
古代 韓日 外交史-三國과 倭를 中心으로-
한국고대사연구
2002 .09
-
신라는 삼국을 통일하려고 하였을까
역사비평
2019 .08
-
廣開土王代의 南方 政策과 韓半島 諸國 및 倭의 動向
한국고대사연구
2012 .09
-
백제 멸망 이후 馬韓 인식의 변화 양상
한국고대사연구
2015 .03
-
永樂 6년 고구려의 백제 침공 원인에 대한 검토 - 〈廣開土王碑〉 辛卯年 기사의 재해석을 중심으로 -
목간과문자
2020 .06
-
7세기 중엽 국제정세 변동과 고구려 대외관계의 추이
대구사학
2018 .01
-
5~6세기 고구려·신라의 경계와 그 양상
역사와현실
2011 .12
-
7세기 후반 한국사의 인식문제 : 신라의 백제통합론과 삼국통일론을 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .09
-
660년대 고구려의 대남방 전략
대구사학
2018 .01
-
百濟 腆支王代 解氏勢力의 擡頭와 對高句麗 政策
한국사연구
2009 .12
-
7세기 중반 高句麗의 東蒙古 進出과 軍事戰略
한국사연구
2009 .03
-
7세기 동아시아의 정세와 전쟁 : 신라의 백제 통합과 관련하여
신라사학보
2016 .12
-
韓ㆍ中 記錄에 나타난 高句麗의 正統性과 그 意味 : 建國始祖神話와 民俗을 중심으로
동아인문학
2004 .12
-
일본 시코쿠(四国)지역의고대한국계 신사(사원)와 전승
日本學硏究
2015 .01
-
남북국의 경계와 상호 교섭에 대한 재검토
역사와현실
2011 .12
-
7~8세기 나당관계의 추이
역사비평
2019 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-003773778