메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제146호
발행연도
2009.9
수록면
361 - 389 (29page)

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The late 7th century is a meaningful period in Korean history. The alliance of Shilla and Tang conquered Baekje in 660 and Kokuryo in 668. Shilla integrated the old territory of Baekje in 671, and Balhae was founded in the old territory of Kokuryo in 698. Associated with the issue of periodization the recognition of this fact can be divided into two viewpoints.
One viewpoint understands the period as Shilla's integration of Baekje and sees the following period as the beginning of the medieval society. Shilla only integrated the old territory of Baekje that was south of the Imjin River in consequence of the International War of East Asia in the 7th century. Since then, Shilla presented a typical ruling system of the medieval society in Korean history by establishing the centralized aristocracy-bureaucrat system.
The other viewpoint understands the period as Shilla's unification of the Three Kingdoms and sees the following period as the succession of ancient state. Shilla unified the Three Kingdoms in 676 by making north of Imjin River as a buffer zone in consequence of the International War of East Asia in the 7th century. Shilla since then strengthened the centralized territory-state system in succession of ancient state.
These two disparate viewpoints recognizing the late 7th century Korean history were also related to the logic of a modern colonial historical view. The issue has already been inherent in Korean history and a theme of controversy for a long time, so it is complicated to reach an agreement into a particular viewpoint. It is a key subject, however, to share the recognition and to improve the research by continuation of controversy.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
Ⅱ. 백제통합전쟁론의 논리
Ⅲ. 삼국통일전쟁론의 논지
Ⅳ. 정리와 과제
〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018887231