메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
고원석 (장로회신학대학교) 정효정 (한양대학교)
저널정보
한국기독교교육정보학회 기독교교육정보 기독교교육정보 제25집
발행연도
2010.4
수록면
7 - 35 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In order to support Web Based Collaborative Learning (WBCL), this study structured the stages of collaborative learning and provided an aid for promoting learners’ active thinking and reflection activities. The collaboration process was largely divided into four stages: 1) learning preparation stage; 2) individual learning stage; 3) collaborative learning stage; and 4) reflection stage. Then, these stages were distinguished in the form of bulletin board inside the community so that the learners could follow the stages in order. In addition, this study attempted to extend the depth and width of thinking by providing Edward de Bono’s ‘Six Thinking Hats’ as an aid for supporting learners’ thinking. The subjects of this study were 32 students in the course of Christian Education (M.A.) at the Graduate School of A Theological Seminary and 18 students attending the class of ‘Christian Education Methodologies’ at the Graduate School of Theology (M.Div) of B Theological Seminary (a total of 50 students). In order to prove the effects of the aid, we provided the aid to the students in Group A but not to those in Group B. According to the results of this study, the effects of WBCL and the aid were as follows. First, WBCL provided learners with opportunities to participate in discussions with spontaneity or responsibility. Furthermore, it expanded the scope of interaction beyond the limitations of class in terms of time and space. Second, it expanded the subjects and relations of interaction. While students were participating actively in discussions and collaborative learning among the team members, other team members and the teacher were able to observe and participate in the discussions. In the course, the learners obtained opportunities for secondary learning through observation, experienced differences in thought, and reflected on their problems by themselves. Moreover, as the teacher could also provide more specific instructive supports (suggestion of reflective questions, etc.) and observe the contents and process of discussions closely in real time, he/she was able to grasp the discussion participants’ thought and thinking process. According to the results of examining the effects of WBCL and the aid, more active collaborative learning was induced by participation in collaborative learning after the individual learning stage, the finishing of collaborative learning through the reflection process, etc. That is, as the learners participated in collaborative activities after refining and deepening their thought through the stage of preparing collaborative learning personally, they could have more diverse and richer conversations and this contributed to high?quality interaction in terms of the quantity and quality of collaborative activities.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 문헌고찰
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-235-002838962