지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since its inception in 1947, GATT has governed the trade-related aspects of investment measures, while leaving other aspects of investment policy to national discretion. On the other hand, as a result of UR Negotiations, the TRIMs Agreement deal with a matter directly investment policy. The TRIMs Agreement left no doubt that it applies to investment measures related to trade in goods only, such as the required use of domestic content in preference to imported goods. But the agreement's scope lie many policies and restrictions that discourage investment as well as inhibiting trade. An Annex to the TRIMs Agreement now clarifies that violations of the TRIMs Agreement can take the form of investment incentives and inducements, as well as mandatory restrictions, and that trade balancing as well as local content requirements are prohibited.
In WTO system, the TRIMs issue has especially been relevant to the automotive industry. The automotive sector in both developing and developed countries is often the subject of special trade and investment restrictions, from import quotas and voluntary restraints to local content rules and other forms of investment incentives and requirements.
In 1996, along with 'Brazil-automobiles case', Indonesia's automotive investment measures attracted the first WTO cases filed under the TRIMs Agreement. This dispute concerns a series of measures maintained by Indonesia with respect to motor vehicles and parts and components thereof. In this case, after finding that the measures in question were inconsistent with Article 2.1 of the TRIMs Agreement, the pane! determined that, based on the principle of judical economy, It did not have to address the claims under Article 3.4 of the GAIT. But the attitude of the Indonesia-auto panel is different from that of subsequent case's panel. In 'India-Auto case', hke the 'Canada-Automotive case', after finding that the measures in question violated Articles 3.4 and 11.1 of the GAIT, the panel applied the principle of judical economy and concluded that It was not necessary to analyse the measures under the TRIMs Agreement. Because of this approach, the Indonesia-auto panel become the focus of criticism. But, although 'Indonesia-Automobiles case' did not result in either strong and effective WTO discipline on special TRIMs, it is true that, on the point that to treat directly the TRIMs, this case is significant dispute in WTO system.
In WTO system, the TRIMs issue has especially been relevant to the automotive industry. The automotive sector in both developing and developed countries is often the subject of special trade and investment restrictions, from import quotas and voluntary restraints to local content rules and other forms of investment incentives and requirements.
In 1996, along with 'Brazil-automobiles case', Indonesia's automotive investment measures attracted the first WTO cases filed under the TRIMs Agreement. This dispute concerns a series of measures maintained by Indonesia with respect to motor vehicles and parts and components thereof. In this case, after finding that the measures in question were inconsistent with Article 2.1 of the TRIMs Agreement, the pane! determined that, based on the principle of judical economy, It did not have to address the claims under Article 3.4 of the GAIT. But the attitude of the Indonesia-auto panel is different from that of subsequent case's panel. In 'India-Auto case', hke the 'Canada-Automotive case', after finding that the measures in question violated Articles 3.4 and 11.1 of the GAIT, the panel applied the principle of judical economy and concluded that It was not necessary to analyse the measures under the TRIMs Agreement. Because of this approach, the Indonesia-auto panel become the focus of criticism. But, although 'Indonesia-Automobiles case' did not result in either strong and effective WTO discipline on special TRIMs, it is true that, on the point that to treat directly the TRIMs, this case is significant dispute in WTO system.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사실관계 및 사건의 경과
Ⅲ. 주요 법적 쟁점
Ⅳ. 패널보고서 평결내용
Ⅴ. 주요 쟁점별 판정내용의 분석
Ⅵ. 판정의 이행
Ⅶ. 사건의 중요성과 시사점
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
WTO에서의 중국자동차분쟁 관련 법적 쟁점 고찰
통상법률
2009 .02
-
WTO체제상의 TRIMs규제제도의 문제
통상법률
2004 .10
-
중국의 WTO · TRIMs 협정 위반 분쟁사례에 관한 연구 : 자동차 부품 사례를 중심으로
통상정보연구
2012 .03
-
WTO에서의 투자인센티브 규제와 문제점
통상법률
2006 .12
-
WTO TRIMs협정에 따른 중국의 외국인 투자법제의 개선에 관한 연구
국제법학회논총
2004 .08
-
Minimization of Parent Roll Trim Loss for the Paper Industry
한국경영과학회지
1978 .06
-
WTO TRIMs협정에 따른 중국의 외국인 투자법제의 개선에 관한 연구
통상법률
2004 .10
-
WTO 무역관련투자조치 협정과 중국의 외국인 투자법제에 관한 연구
한국동북아논총
2004 .03
-
인도네시아의 교역조건과 투자 관계
아시아연구
2014 .03
-
캐나다-재생에너지 발전차액지원제도 사건 판정에 대한 비판적 고찰 : WTO 보조금협정에서의 혜택분석 및 관련시장 결정을 중심으로
국제경제법연구
2014 .07
-
인도의 미국산 태양전지ㆍ모듈 제품의 차별에 관한 WTO 판례 연구
미국헌법연구
2017 .12
-
The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Korea
[KIEP] East Asian Economic Review
2013 .12
-
U.S. TRADE POLICY UNDER THE WTO
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
1995 .02
-
국제경제법상 개발도상국의 지위
국제경제법연구
2007 .12
-
中國의 WTO 加入이 韓國의 對中投資에 미치는 영향
관세학회지
2000 .08
-
중국의 WTO가입 이후 외국인 직접투자전략 변화와 한국 기업의 대중국투자 촉진 방안
무역학회지
2003 .09
-
다자간환경협약과 WTO협정과의 관계 : 교통의정서를 중심으로
국제경제법연구
2005 .12
-
지역무역협정 관련 WTO 규범의 통상법적 고찰
무역학회지
2004 .08
-
WTO 협정상 환경보호를 위한 무역규제의 성립요건에 관한 분석
무역학회지
2006 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
국제관계이론의 한국적 수용과 대안적 접근
전재성
,
박건영
국제정치논총
2002
.12
GATT/WTO 판례를 통한 GATT 제3조의 분석과 평가
김대순
,
김민서
국제법학회논총
2014
.09
중국의 WTO · TRIMs 협정 위반 분쟁사례에 관한 연구 : 자동차 부품 사례를 중심으로
김종훈
통상정보연구
2012
.03
대기업 유통자본 규제를 위한 국내 규제조치와 WTO 서비스무역협정에 관한 일반협정(GATS) 불일치 여부에 관한 연구
김우형
법학연구
2012
.11
WTO보조금 협정하의 분쟁사례 연구 : 조선 및 하이닉스 반도체의 보조금 분쟁을 중심으로
김지용
통상정보연구
2007
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-361-002620814