지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the Goryeo dynasty there emerged a special class within the royal family: the illegitimate offspring of the king. As such, despite the fact that the king was their father, if the social status of their mother was too low for her to become a queen, these children were not recognized as princes or princesses. In such cases, the mother generally became a concubine while her children were classified as the illegitimate offspring of the king. The sons of such unions, who were referred to as Sokoon, had no right to ascend to the throne and more often than not were forced to become monks. Meanwhile, the daughters of such unions received different treatment from the one given to princesses. While princesses married someone from the royal family, the daughters of such unions were made to marry a commoner. The husband of such daughters was called Gookseo.
The reason why these people were not bestowed the status of prince and princess was because their mother was from a humble background or belonged to the lower classes of society. The existence of the Sokoon within the royal family was the result of one of the unique principles of the Goryeo dynasty: the practice of defining a persons social status by their mother as well as their fathers bloodline.
In most instances, those who became Gookseo after marrying a princess whose mother was a concubine were sons of common government officials.
However, even though these individuals were married to princesses, their descendents were not treated as members of the royal family. Thus, rather than receiving titles of nobility, the Gookseo found themselves appointed to some minor posts. This practice of appointing such individuals to minor posts was also applied to the descendents of the Gookseos wife. These individuals were treated differently because they were the descendents of a concubine of the royal family. In some cases, this stigma was applied for many generations: with one case unearthed of a man being denied a higher position due to the fact that his great grandmother had been a concubine.
The limitations placed on a concubines children, which remained in place for many generations, were caused by their ancestry on their mothers side. As such, as these concubines were not considered to be worthy of becoming queens, the Sokoon, Gookseo. as well as their descendents, became the subject of discrimination for many generations.
The reason why these people were not bestowed the status of prince and princess was because their mother was from a humble background or belonged to the lower classes of society. The existence of the Sokoon within the royal family was the result of one of the unique principles of the Goryeo dynasty: the practice of defining a persons social status by their mother as well as their fathers bloodline.
In most instances, those who became Gookseo after marrying a princess whose mother was a concubine were sons of common government officials.
However, even though these individuals were married to princesses, their descendents were not treated as members of the royal family. Thus, rather than receiving titles of nobility, the Gookseo found themselves appointed to some minor posts. This practice of appointing such individuals to minor posts was also applied to the descendents of the Gookseos wife. These individuals were treated differently because they were the descendents of a concubine of the royal family. In some cases, this stigma was applied for many generations: with one case unearthed of a man being denied a higher position due to the fact that his great grandmother had been a concubine.
The limitations placed on a concubines children, which remained in place for many generations, were caused by their ancestry on their mothers side. As such, as these concubines were not considered to be worthy of becoming queens, the Sokoon, Gookseo. as well as their descendents, became the subject of discrimination for many generations.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. ‘小君制’의 성립 배경과 왕실의 구성
Ⅲ. 國壻의 家門
Ⅳ. ‘小君制’와 고려의 폐쇄적 혈통의식
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선 초기 王親婚 王室 妾子孫에 대한 사회적 인식
한국사학보
2012 .08
-
조선 『璿源錄』에 기재된 宗親의 통혼 양태와 그 의미
古文書硏究
2018 .01
-
朝鮮初期儀賓의 再婚문제와 그 자손에 대한 처우
역사와실학
2017 .04
-
조선중기(연산군~현종) 後宮의 입궁과 사회적 위상
한국사연구
2011 .09
-
15세기 천첩자녀(賤妾子女)의 재산상속과 사회적 지위
역사와현실
2006 .03
-
정조~순조대 綏嬪 朴氏의 역할과 위상
한국인물사연구
2016 .09
-
魏晉南朝 妾生母를 위한 服喪論 변화
중국사연구
2014 .01
-
조선시대 선왕 후궁에 대한 처우와 궁가(宮家)의 변천
여성과역사
2019 .01
-
고려 중기 왕실과 화엄종 : 왕실 출신 화엄종 5 국사(國師)를 중심으로
역사와현실
2011 .03
-
고려의 ‘不稱姓’의 특권과 王家
역사와 담론
2018 .01
-
忠烈王代 薊國大長公主의 改嫁運動
한국인물사연구
2008 .03
-
조선 초기의 後宮 : 태조~성종조 後宮의 신분적 지위를 중심으로
사학연구
2009 .12
-
조선『璿源錄』중종 공주·옹주 계열 후손의 연혼 양상과 그 성격
古文書硏究
2018 .01
-
조선전기 후궁의 비구니 출가와 불교신행
불교학보
2011 .04
-
통일신라시대의 王과 王妃
신라사학보
2011 .08
-
조선 태조ㆍ세종대 세자빈 폐출 사건의 의미 : 현빈 유씨, 휘빈 김씨, 순빈 봉씨를 중심으로
한국인물사연구
2010 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0100-2009-911-018289644