지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The national administration of Goryeo was led by King and bureaucratic cabinet according to the system. This government system reflects the idea of Goryeo's ruling class about the role and status between King and bureaucrat. This idea can be considered as the combination of King's supremacy in status and authority and bureaucrat's obedient role in national administration.
First of all, the King was thought as being given the divine right. The person who sat on the throne must be given it, and this right was given to Wang geon(王建) and his descendents. So Providence idea that only Wang geon's descendents could become King appeared and it could be confirmed by the idea that the next King succeeded to his ancestor's royal authority. This ban that any other family line could not become King protected Goryeo dynasty.
These ideas made the King as a superior being separated form his bureaucrat. The bureaucrats and people thought that the royal authority did not belong to them. So rebellion against royal authority or assassination of royal family were considered high treason. Moreover, the ruling class thought that only King had the real right of governing the nation, not bureaucrat cabinet. Especially, the rights of reward and punishment and personal promotion were considered King's unique rights.
Goryeo's ruling class recognized the royal authority as the actual power, not just the abstract concept. The King was not only the highest governor but also the strong leader who controlled the national administration. But they did not admit the dogmatic ruling of King. They were always cautious about King's dogmatic decisions and at the same time criticised that the powerful bureaucrats controlled the national government on their own. Goryeo's ruling class expected that King owned the actual leadership in the national administration but criticised that King and some bureaucrats lopsidedly managed on their way.
They also thought that King could control in the nation administration but also govern with his bureaucrats. The King was asked to treat his bureaucrat cabinet with proper manner. Its political meaning was that the King need to accept the bureaucrats' requests and arguments. So the King who followed this manner was recognized as the gracious King.
These ideas that Goryeo's ruling class had were well-shown in Jeong-gwan-jeong-yo(貞觀政要), a book widely read among them. This book contained that the ruler could control the government but manage the administration harmoniously with the bureaucratic cabinet. It emphasized the ruler's moral training and virtue that accepted bureaucrats' requests and arguments. This book accorded with Goryeo's ruling class so was wide spreaded among them. They also adapted ‘3 minister 6 department system’ from Dang to make their idea come real. As result, the political system of Goryeo was lead by King but the King governed the national administration with agreement of the bureaucratic cabinet. This political system attributed to stabilize politics in the early Goryeo period.
First of all, the King was thought as being given the divine right. The person who sat on the throne must be given it, and this right was given to Wang geon(王建) and his descendents. So Providence idea that only Wang geon's descendents could become King appeared and it could be confirmed by the idea that the next King succeeded to his ancestor's royal authority. This ban that any other family line could not become King protected Goryeo dynasty.
These ideas made the King as a superior being separated form his bureaucrat. The bureaucrats and people thought that the royal authority did not belong to them. So rebellion against royal authority or assassination of royal family were considered high treason. Moreover, the ruling class thought that only King had the real right of governing the nation, not bureaucrat cabinet. Especially, the rights of reward and punishment and personal promotion were considered King's unique rights.
Goryeo's ruling class recognized the royal authority as the actual power, not just the abstract concept. The King was not only the highest governor but also the strong leader who controlled the national administration. But they did not admit the dogmatic ruling of King. They were always cautious about King's dogmatic decisions and at the same time criticised that the powerful bureaucrats controlled the national government on their own. Goryeo's ruling class expected that King owned the actual leadership in the national administration but criticised that King and some bureaucrats lopsidedly managed on their way.
They also thought that King could control in the nation administration but also govern with his bureaucrats. The King was asked to treat his bureaucrat cabinet with proper manner. Its political meaning was that the King need to accept the bureaucrats' requests and arguments. So the King who followed this manner was recognized as the gracious King.
These ideas that Goryeo's ruling class had were well-shown in Jeong-gwan-jeong-yo(貞觀政要), a book widely read among them. This book contained that the ruler could control the government but manage the administration harmoniously with the bureaucratic cabinet. It emphasized the ruler's moral training and virtue that accepted bureaucrats' requests and arguments. This book accorded with Goryeo's ruling class so was wide spreaded among them. They also adapted ‘3 minister 6 department system’ from Dang to make their idea come real. As result, the political system of Goryeo was lead by King but the King governed the national administration with agreement of the bureaucratic cabinet. This political system attributed to stabilize politics in the early Goryeo period.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 국왕의 초월적 위상과 권한에 대한 관념
Ⅲ. 국정운영에서 君臣의 역할에 대한 기대 관념
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고려 전기 정기적 국왕 행사의 내용과 의미
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
[고려] ‘인간의 삶’에 대한 다양한 관심, 그리고 무관심 : 2011년∼2012년 고려시대사 연구 동향
역사학보
2013 .09
-
高麗時代 宋商 貿易의 再照明
역사교육
2007 .12
-
고려전기 정부의 한인(漢人)인식과 내투(來投) 한인들의 행적
역사와현실
2012 .06
-
13~14세기 고려 지식인의 시대 인식과 정체성
역사와현실
2020 .03
-
Listening to the Beat of Different Drums : Rituals, Music, and Ideology in Goryeo
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .12
-
13∼14세기 요동 고려인 세력과 고려 왕실의 충돌
한국사연구
2018 .06
-
주몽고려, 궁예고려, 왕건고려, 코리아의 단절과 계승
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
「『高麗圖經』 譯註」(3) : 권2 「世次」편의 분석을 중심으로
한국사학보
2017 .05
-
고려 외교에서 의례(儀禮)와 국왕의 자세
역사와현실
2014 .12
-
고려시대 관료·군 조직에서 규율과 복종
동방학지
2005 .01
-
공민왕대 관제개편의 내용 및 의미
역사학보
2009 .03
-
고구려와 고려의 역사적 계승 관계
한국고대사연구
2004 .03
-
고려시대 사람들의 改名
동방학지
2008 .01
-
12세기 초 국제 정세와 麗金 간의 전쟁과 외교
동북아역사논총
2011 .12
-
高麗의 관료제 관련 법령에서의 唐令의 영향
중국고중세사연구
2012 .02
-
고려 지배층의 신라 출자의식과 그 사회적 성격
역사와현실
2019 .06
-
Political Perception of Bureaucratic Elite in Korea
Korea Journal
1973 .10
-
제7차 현행 고등학교 국사교과서의 고려시대 정치사 내용 분석과 개선 방향
역사와실학
2008 .09
-
高麗時代 海上交流와 ‘海禁’
동양사학연구
2014 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018333278