지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the pre-modern times, calling one"s name was a means to cement the stratification of status. As well as reference and address terms for others to call themselves, whether calling oneself in front of others also was determined by one"s status. In the tenth year of Yejong"s reign (1114), appellation that should be used in private letters as well as official documents was prescribed. What is intriguing is that the principle of stratification also acted in calling last name in Goryeo.
One"s last name not being called was a kind of privilege in Goryeo. In other words, whether one"s last name was called or not was a standard to differentiate the hierarchy in the bureaucracy, and in Goryeo the royal family and high officials received respectful treatment of their last name not being called. However, the royal privilege of unspoken family name essentially had a different meaning from that of high officials. Not calling the last names of high officials was basically a means to represent that they were in the relationship of ruler and ruled, while the royal privilege of unspoken family name was a device to show that they and the king had special relationship. As the two groups" not calling the last name had a very different meaning, inevitably the scope of application of such rule differed. In the case of high officials, their last name not being called was applied only to certain cases while the royal family was granted such privilege in all areas related to public affairs.
The institution of the royal privilege of unspoken family name essentially had a different meaning from that of high officials. that seems to have already started during Hyeonjong at the latest existed solely in Goryeo. Those who became the son-in-laws of the royal family with different last names received such benefits; the principle of bilateral kindred operated in Goyreo.
The royal privilege of unspoken family name contributed to sanctification of royal family, conducive to stabilization of the Goryeo"s royal authority. In fact, the royal privilege of unspoken family name was a device for the royal family name not to be called in public affairs. When a national ceremony was held, the royal family name was not able to be called and in all kinds of public documents, the royal family name was not able to be used. the royal family name also was not able to be inscribed in writings. The principle of avoiding calling one"s original names--that a noble subject should not be called nor written--was applied to the royal family name. Through such principle, the royal family name was able to obtain political and social position as a noble last name, which helped the Goryeo royal family to monopolize the throne.
One"s last name not being called was a kind of privilege in Goryeo. In other words, whether one"s last name was called or not was a standard to differentiate the hierarchy in the bureaucracy, and in Goryeo the royal family and high officials received respectful treatment of their last name not being called. However, the royal privilege of unspoken family name essentially had a different meaning from that of high officials. Not calling the last names of high officials was basically a means to represent that they were in the relationship of ruler and ruled, while the royal privilege of unspoken family name was a device to show that they and the king had special relationship. As the two groups" not calling the last name had a very different meaning, inevitably the scope of application of such rule differed. In the case of high officials, their last name not being called was applied only to certain cases while the royal family was granted such privilege in all areas related to public affairs.
The institution of the royal privilege of unspoken family name essentially had a different meaning from that of high officials. that seems to have already started during Hyeonjong at the latest existed solely in Goryeo. Those who became the son-in-laws of the royal family with different last names received such benefits; the principle of bilateral kindred operated in Goyreo.
The royal privilege of unspoken family name contributed to sanctification of royal family, conducive to stabilization of the Goryeo"s royal authority. In fact, the royal privilege of unspoken family name was a device for the royal family name not to be called in public affairs. When a national ceremony was held, the royal family name was not able to be called and in all kinds of public documents, the royal family name was not able to be used. the royal family name also was not able to be inscribed in writings. The principle of avoiding calling one"s original names--that a noble subject should not be called nor written--was applied to the royal family name. Through such principle, the royal family name was able to obtain political and social position as a noble last name, which helped the Goryeo royal family to monopolize the throne.
목차
국문 초록
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 不稱姓의 역사적 연원과 그 의미
Ⅲ. 고려 왕가의 不稱姓 특례와 그 의미
Ⅳ. 왕가 불칭성의 고려적 특성
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1826년 『예식통고(例式通攷)』의 편찬과 왕실재정의 정비 노력
역사와현실
2018 .03
-
왕실 여성의 구개음화 실현 양상 연구-언간 자료를 중심으로-
한말연구
2021 .01
-
朝鮮初期儀賓의 再婚문제와 그 자손에 대한 처우
역사와실학
2017 .04
-
13∼14세기 요동 고려인 세력과 고려 왕실의 충돌
한국사연구
2018 .06
-
조선시대 해주정씨의 王室婚과 家計經營
역사민속학
2015 .03
-
家系와 婚脈을 통해서 본 仁興君家의 政治ㆍ社會的 位相
문화사학
2022 .12
-
朝鮮 官窯에서의 私燔 실태와 영향
역사와 담론
2018 .04
-
조선시대 왕실여성의 사인(死因) 유형과 임종장소 변화 - 후궁을 중심으로 -
한국사연구
2021 .12
-
Clashes between Liaodong Koreans and the Goryeo Royal House in the 13th to 14th Centuries
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2020 .06
-
일제강점기 이왕가(李王家) 재산의 구성과 관리 - 기본재산(基本財産)을 중심으로
인문사회과학연구
2015 .01
-
일제강점기 이왕가(李王家)의 세습재산
인문사회과학연구
2017 .01
-
율곡 대동사회론의 철학적 지향과 해석의 전환
동서철학연구
2016 .09
-
가족 의사소통에 대한 구성원들의 인식 연구 : 대학생 자녀를 둔 가정을 중심으로
국어교육연구
2015 .06
-
제왕신탁의 관점으로 본 “다윗의 마지막 말” (사무엘하 23장 1-7절)
구약논단
2018 .03
-
7세기 동아시아 정세에서 본 上宮王家 멸망사건
역사학보
2015 .12
-
고려중기 최씨무신집정가의 공적 위상과 특권 - ‘제왕가(諸王家)’로서의 정체성을 중심으로 -
한국사연구
2024 .12
-
司法문제를 통해서 본 몽골 복속기 고려국왕 위상 : 다루가치 · 管軍官 체재기의 ‘雜問’을 중심으로
사학연구
2016 .03
-
기록으로 살펴 본 조선시대 왕실하사 은기의 변화 양상
강좌 미술사
2020 .01
-
분원공소기(分院貢所期, 1883-1895) 왕실용 백자의 진상체계와 진상용 백자의 성격 : 분원자기공소절목과 하재일기의 비교분석을 통해
역사와 담론
2017 .01
-
조선『璿源錄』중종 공주·옹주 계열 후손의 연혼 양상과 그 성격
古文書硏究
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-911-001778148