지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2001.11
- 수록면
- 117 - 151 (35page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Criminal Procedure is given two tasks; one is the necessities of discovering the substantial truth including arrest and punishment of criminals, protection of sufferers and maintenance of public order. The other is the requirement for the security of human rights, which protected the human rights of the suspected and the accused from being punished with committing no crime by the potential misjudgement of human being who was not god. There occur a conflict between the two tasks throughout the whole area in the criminal procedure.
A primary purpose of bail can be said to implement the ideology of embodiment of justice and to protect human rights in criminal justice system. A major justification of bail was that the bail procedure can be employed in courts as a way to avoid the probable confinement of innocent persons, who are falsely accused. Another justification of bail was that the historical legal doctrine. Presumption of Innocent, would not be appropriately implemented in judicial processing without a bail provision. However the results of empirical analysis showed that the bail provision of a person before indictment in Korea has been implemented in a limited scope, and that the provision has been improperly applied in several ways.
This study recommends that more efforts should be given to correct the problem on the implementation and application of bail provision of a person before indictment in Criminal Procedure Law. This Study suggests that it is necessary to enlarge the scope of application of bail. Bail shall be available even for the suspects, if it is certain that they will be appear at courts on the appointed date. It is necessary to develope alternative methods-Release on personal recognizance, Conditional release, Station house Citation Release-for the allowance of bail in addition to the traditional method-Monetary bail. It is necessary to provide the judge with detailed guides, which can be adopted when the judge decide the amount of the bail bond. This Study suggests that the amount of the bail bond shall be considered as a way for poor defendants to prepare the bail money.
A primary purpose of bail can be said to implement the ideology of embodiment of justice and to protect human rights in criminal justice system. A major justification of bail was that the bail procedure can be employed in courts as a way to avoid the probable confinement of innocent persons, who are falsely accused. Another justification of bail was that the historical legal doctrine. Presumption of Innocent, would not be appropriately implemented in judicial processing without a bail provision. However the results of empirical analysis showed that the bail provision of a person before indictment in Korea has been implemented in a limited scope, and that the provision has been improperly applied in several ways.
This study recommends that more efforts should be given to correct the problem on the implementation and application of bail provision of a person before indictment in Criminal Procedure Law. This Study suggests that it is necessary to enlarge the scope of application of bail. Bail shall be available even for the suspects, if it is certain that they will be appear at courts on the appointed date. It is necessary to develope alternative methods-Release on personal recognizance, Conditional release, Station house Citation Release-for the allowance of bail in addition to the traditional method-Monetary bail. It is necessary to provide the judge with detailed guides, which can be adopted when the judge decide the amount of the bail bond. This Study suggests that the amount of the bail bond shall be considered as a way for poor defendants to prepare the bail money.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 우리나라의 起訴前 被疑者保釋制度의 新設背景과 內容
Ⅲ. 美國의 聯邦保釋改革法의 變遷
Ⅳ. 美國의 裁判前 釋放의 類型과 制限
Ⅴ. 現行 被疑者保釋制度의 問題點
Ⅵ. 現行 被疑者保釋制度의 改善方案의 提示
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
保釋制度에 관한 小考
법학연구
2004 .12
-
시스템적으로 중요한 금융회사(SIFI)의 정리제도:채권자 손실분담제도(Bail-in)의 법적쟁점을 중심으로
은행법연구
2018 .01
-
Is Bail-in Debt Bail-inable?
[KDI] Journal of Economic Policy
2019 .11
-
우리나라 보석제도의 운영현황과 개선방향
형사정책연구원 연구총서
1992 .12
-
형사소송법과 유추금지
형사정책연구
2003 .06
-
미국과 영국의 체포·구금제도의 비교법적 고찰 : 체포·구금의 요건 및 처리절차를 중심으로
한양법학
2011 .05
-
베일인 제도의 한국내 도입을 위한 법적 고려사항
증권법연구
2014 .08
-
법규형 채권자 손실분담제도(Bail-in) 국내 도입 시 법제 정비 방안 : ｢금융산업의 구조개선에 관한 법률｣ 개정 방안을 중심으로
[BOK] 금융경제법 연구논문 현상공모 수상논문집
2018 .12
-
인신구속제도의 일원화에 관한 연구 : 주요 선진국의 인신구속제도 비교를 중심으로
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
Research on Regulatory Implementation of the Recapitalization by Private Sectors for the Distressed Systemically Important Firms: Focusing on the Constitutional Court Cases in Korea
경영법률
2014 .01
-
새로운 ｢금융회사 정리체계｣ 정비 관련 주요 과제
은행법연구
2018 .01
-
지방분권화와 연성예산제약
사회과학연구
2016 .03
-
체포·구속된 피의자 보석에 관한 고찰
비교형사법연구
2004 .01
-
개정형사소송법에 있어서 인신구속제도 : 불구속수사 및 불구속재판원칙의 확대방안을 중심으로
성신법학
2009 .02
-
조선시대 保放의 典據와 그 實態
법사학연구
2006 .04
-
불구속수사·재판의 원칙의 발전과 정체, 인신구속제도의 재편(再編) 방안
인권과 정의
2019 .01
-
영미 체포‧구속제도의 특징과 그 비교법적 함의
비교형사법연구
2009 .01
-
군 수사절차상 인신구속제도의 문제점과 개선방안
형사정책연구
2003 .09
-
소년범죄자에 대한 전자감독 확대방안 모색을 위한 고찰
한양법학
2011 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0