메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.7 Number.3
발행연도
2007.9
수록면
365 - 387 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to examine how college EFL learners use learning strategies in performing a multiple-choice doze test. Based on a general framework of cognitive and metacognitive strategies referred to O'Malley et a1. (1985) and Oxford (1990), the verbal protocols produced by four EFL learners were analyzed in terms of doze item types and learning strategy types. The findings show that textual items were the easiest to both successful and less successful learners but the successful learners performed better on lexical and grammatical items. In addition, regardless of reading proficiency, a variety of cognitive strategies (303/384, 79%) were utilized: the successful learners favored 'reading in L2' the most while the less successful learners used 'translation into L1' most frequently. As for metacognitive strategy use, the multiple-choice format prompted the learners to often employ 'matching and elimination.' Overall, the successful learners showed greater metacognitive control and were more persistent in coping with the doze task. Issues of reading proficiency, test format and item types, and learning strategies are addressed with implications for the doze test construction.

목차

1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Method
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusion
References
Appendix

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-740-014916983