지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to examine legislative provisions for the protection of computer software in the United States, Japan and European Union in exploring some means of legally protecting computer software in Korea. The necessity for such protections has surfaced with the introduction of programing languages such as COBOL and FORTRAN in the 1950s. The issue of copyright for computer software was not so serious in the 1950s but with the wide spread supply of software for general office tasks in the 1960s, the programers began to see the need for legal protection of their products.
The source code and object code which contains the expressed ideas are protected by the copyright law, even though the idea itself may not be protected by the same law. On the other hand, if the ideas which are expressed in the form of computer programs are maintained and managed in secret, they can be protected in accordance with the trade secret law. Also the program ideas can be protected by the patent law if they satisfy the requirements of the legislation.
Same program developers are seeking to obtain legal protection through patent law in 1980s. Section 101 of the US patent law grants patents to the inventors who produce a product which meets the requirements of industrial Utility, Originality and Non-obviousness. And so the program to link its ideas with physical objects in order to secure the patent satisfies the requirements of patent in US.
However, a fundamental question has to be raised with regard to the capacity of computer software to satisfy the requirements of the patent in korea. Clause 1 of the article 2 of the Korean patent act differs from the spirit of section 101 of the US patent law in that it adds the requirements regarding the utility of the natural law. This in fact strengthens the physical element of the software for Computer Software-related Inventions. Considered in this very light, the Korean Guidelines for Computer Software-related Inventions(1998) which has granted a patent for the "computer readable memory" raises a serious feasibility issue in the context of Korean patent law.
The source code and object code which contains the expressed ideas are protected by the copyright law, even though the idea itself may not be protected by the same law. On the other hand, if the ideas which are expressed in the form of computer programs are maintained and managed in secret, they can be protected in accordance with the trade secret law. Also the program ideas can be protected by the patent law if they satisfy the requirements of the legislation.
Same program developers are seeking to obtain legal protection through patent law in 1980s. Section 101 of the US patent law grants patents to the inventors who produce a product which meets the requirements of industrial Utility, Originality and Non-obviousness. And so the program to link its ideas with physical objects in order to secure the patent satisfies the requirements of patent in US.
However, a fundamental question has to be raised with regard to the capacity of computer software to satisfy the requirements of the patent in korea. Clause 1 of the article 2 of the Korean patent act differs from the spirit of section 101 of the US patent law in that it adds the requirements regarding the utility of the natural law. This in fact strengthens the physical element of the software for Computer Software-related Inventions. Considered in this very light, the Korean Guidelines for Computer Software-related Inventions(1998) which has granted a patent for the "computer readable memory" raises a serious feasibility issue in the context of Korean patent law.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 영업비밀보호법에 의한 보호
Ⅲ. 저작권법에 의한 보호
Ⅳ. 특허법에 의한 보호
Ⅴ. 결론
[Zusammenfassung]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
컴퓨터프로그램의 특허법상 물건성 인정의 필요성에 대한 고찰
원광법학
2013 .01
-
컴퓨터프로그램의 특허권적 보호와 저작권적 보호
과학기술법연구
2005 .01
-
전자거래에 있어서 권리보호에 관한 법적 검토-비즈니스모델의 특허성립을 중심으로-
인터넷전자상거래연구
2003 .02
-
국내 및 해외 특허 분석 시스템 개발 동향에 대한 연구
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2011 .05
-
특허소송제도와 활성화에 관한 검토
법과정책
2018 .01
-
On the Patentability of Artificial Intelligence: a review of recent cases from the U.S.
국제거래와 법
2020 .10
-
지식흐름과 기술혁신에 있어서 특허정보의 역할
과학기술법연구
2011 .01
-
Patent Protection in China
저스티스
1990 .08
-
영업방법 발명 등 컴퓨터프로그램 관련 발명의 특허법적 보호에 관한 비교법적 고찰
비교사법
2009 .09
-
권리범위확인심판에서의 진보성결여에 근거한 특허무효 및 특허권남용 판단에 관한 비판적 고찰 : 특허법원 2009.2.18.선고 2008허3889판결의 분석을 중심으로
기업법연구
2011 .03
-
기업의 특허 역량이 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증 분석 : 우수 벤처기업을 중심으로
지식경영연구
2010 .01
-
발명의 국제적 보호방법의 변천과 시사점
한양법학
2011 .02
-
특허의 경제적 수명의 결정요인에 관한 연구 : 갱신자료를 활용한 생존분석
지식경영연구
2010 .01
-
기업의 보유 특허 특성과 경제적 활용 가능성에 대한 연구-의료화학산업 특허를 중심으로
지식경영연구
2013 .01
-
일본에서 특허의 유효성에 대한 중재가능성-킬비 판결(일본 특허법 제104조의3)을 중심으로-
중재연구
2011 .01
-
특허요건 관련 법률의 개선방안에 관한 연구
법학연구
2012 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-016009407