메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 기업법연구 제19권 제2호
발행연도
2005.6
수록면
411 - 431 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Currently, many companies are adopting performance-based pay. Annual salary system is an embodiment of performance-based pay system. As performance and achievment of workers have direct impact upon level of wages in the annual salary system, theoretical problems emerge in the system. The problems are new and unexpected from the viewpoints of existing wage-related laws. Performance-based pay system itself requires flexible application of labor law. In this regard, review of labor law is necessary. Rigid labor law system is not suitable for the performance-based pay system that is being adopted by many companies to cope with changes in economic environment.
On a personnel rating under a seniority-based wage scheme, the typical life-time employment system in Korea, is holding a key role recently as our companies attempt the conversion of the scheme into a performance appraisal system. But there are not a generalized appraisal system standard for companies in Korea. Also, it is not sure that most of employees understand the performance appraisal system enough to know the operation of the appraisal, objectivity and impartiality should be verified.
In the past employees could insist that there was discrimination of treatment under the personnel rating underlying the existing conventional seniority-based wage scheme or large-observation for promotion and disciplinal. But under ability-criteria or a performance appraisal standard, it was hard for the existing data to be applied to legal proceedings and they even couldn't be presented as a suffcient evidence of unfair dealing in a lawsuit.

목차

Ⅰ 문제의 제기

Ⅱ. 업적평가 실시 상황과 문제점

Ⅲ. 업적평가의 법적 접근과 법적규제 대한 논의 검토

Ⅳ. 업적평가를 둘러싼 법적 문제

Ⅴ. 업적평가의 납득성 향상을 위한 법제도적 과제

Ⅵ. 결론

참고문헌

Astract

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-017815669