지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제208집
- 발행연도
- 2025.3
- 수록면
- 115 - 148 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2025.03.208.115
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to explore the specifics of the ceramic trade and technological exchanges between Joseon and China during the Imjin War, the Jeongyu War, and the period of the Ming-Qing transition, in the context of the international political situation. By doing so, it seeks to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the changes in Joseon’s ceramic culture in the 17th century.
The 17th century was a period of significant political, economic, and social transformations in Joseon. Amid these changes, the international trade environment of Joseon unfolded in new ways, yet Chinese ceramics continued to be imported and consumed not only by the royal court but also by the general public. Chinese ceramics became a crucial reference point for Joseon’s own ceramic production, leading to efforts to imitate their forms in the royal kilns and the adoption of broader foot-ring styles, reflecting a proactive acceptance of Chinese technological influences.
Although ceramic production in Joseon temporarily declined after the wars, the 17th century saw the emergence of new kiln structures, such as the history-arch-shaped furnaces with increasingly wide openings from the firebox to the chimney, and the division of kiln interiors into multiple chambers. These changes were aimed at improving production efficiency and optimizing the flow of heat, which suggests influences beyond Joseon’s internal developments. Given that regions with more advanced ceramic technologies, such as Ming-dynasty Fujian and Guangdong, had a considerable impact, the potential for technological exchanges with these areas is explored in this study.
Thus, the 17th century ceramic exchanges between Joseon and China represent not just trade transactions, but also significant technological interactions. Further detailed investigations are needed regarding the kiln structures, kiln tools, and firing methods that link Joseon with Fujian and Guangdong. This paper highlights the importance of ongoing multi-dimensional exchanges involving goods, people, and technologies, even amid the political and diplomatic instability of the 17th century. Future archaeological studies and literature research will contribute to a richer understanding of the ceramic exchanges between Joseon and China during this period.
The 17th century was a period of significant political, economic, and social transformations in Joseon. Amid these changes, the international trade environment of Joseon unfolded in new ways, yet Chinese ceramics continued to be imported and consumed not only by the royal court but also by the general public. Chinese ceramics became a crucial reference point for Joseon’s own ceramic production, leading to efforts to imitate their forms in the royal kilns and the adoption of broader foot-ring styles, reflecting a proactive acceptance of Chinese technological influences.
Although ceramic production in Joseon temporarily declined after the wars, the 17th century saw the emergence of new kiln structures, such as the history-arch-shaped furnaces with increasingly wide openings from the firebox to the chimney, and the division of kiln interiors into multiple chambers. These changes were aimed at improving production efficiency and optimizing the flow of heat, which suggests influences beyond Joseon’s internal developments. Given that regions with more advanced ceramic technologies, such as Ming-dynasty Fujian and Guangdong, had a considerable impact, the potential for technological exchanges with these areas is explored in this study.
Thus, the 17th century ceramic exchanges between Joseon and China represent not just trade transactions, but also significant technological interactions. Further detailed investigations are needed regarding the kiln structures, kiln tools, and firing methods that link Joseon with Fujian and Guangdong. This paper highlights the importance of ongoing multi-dimensional exchanges involving goods, people, and technologies, even amid the political and diplomatic instability of the 17th century. Future archaeological studies and literature research will contribute to a richer understanding of the ceramic exchanges between Joseon and China during this period.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 조선의 중국산 도자 수입과 모방
Ⅲ. 인구 이동과 도자 기술 수용의 가능성
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1870년대 이후 조일(朝日) 요업 근대화 비교 고찰
강좌 미술사
2021 .12
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
조선물산공진회 지역별 출품사례를 통한 1910년대 요업의 실마리 찾기
역사와 담론
2017 .01
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
조선시대 유적 출토 明代 자기에 대한 몇 가지 再考
한국학연구
2019 .09
-
애국계몽기(1900~1910) 민족신문에 표출된 도자기업 개혁 구현과 부국지술론(富國之術論) : 황성신문과 대한매일신보를 중심으로
인문과학연구
2024 .08
-
北宋代 貢瓷에 대한 인식과定窯와 汝窯의 성격
중국사연구
2015 .01
-
조선 말 청화백자에 장식된 외국산 직물 문양의 연원과 유입과정
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2018 .06
-
To Remember the Ming: Eighteenth-Century Joseon Envoys and their Interpreters on the Ming-Qing Transition
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2022 .06
-
근대 영국의 한국도자 컬렉션의형성 과정과 그 의미
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2019 .01
-
日本 太宰府 觀世音寺址 출토 麗末鮮初 陶磁의 편년과 유통
야외고고학
2017 .07
-
Moving Beyond Politics: Western Scholarship on Joseon
Korea Journal
2021 .09
-
1930년대 중후반 식민지 조선 금융기구 개편론의 전개와 함의
한국사연구
2020 .09
-
일제 강점 전반기 관립 중앙시험소 기술 관료집단의 요업정책 구현과 공업교육의 영향력
무형유산
2021 .12
-
朝鮮 初期 中國語 通譯 發展 背景에 관한 硏究 －≪朝鮮王朝實錄≫의 記錄을 中心으로－
중국어문학
2015 .01
-
박물관 한국 도자기 유물명 번역의 통시적 고찰 - 제국의 아카이브에서 주체적 표상으로
번역학연구
2024 .12
-
The Zhonghua Community Strategy in the Early Joseon Dynasty: The Establishment of Rituals and the Change in Ming’s Attitude toward Joseon
Korea Journal
2023 .12
-
1598년 조선 조정의 명군지휘부 접촉과 전쟁국면 調整
史叢(사총)
2024 .09
-
[서평]『새로 쓰는 17세기 조선 유학사』[강지은, 2021, 푸른역사]
한국사상사학
2021 .08
-
『朝鮮賦』의 한중일 간행과 유통
장서각
2015 .04
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0