지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제190집
- 발행연도
- 2020.9
- 수록면
- 275 - 306 (32page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2020.09.190.275
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
When the Bank of Joseon withdrew from Manchuria in the mid-1930s, multilateral discussions on the reorganization of financial institutions took place. The discussions largely centered on the policy authorities and related financial institutions, and the authorities agreed on the principle of making the Bank of Joseon the central financial institution in Joseon. However, the Government General of Korea tried to secure supervisory authority over the Bank of Joseon, which was dominated by the Ministry of Finance, and also tried to minimize the reduction of the general banking operations of Joseon Siksan Bank, over which it had the supervisory authority. On the other hand, the Ministry of Finance tried to control colonial finance from the parent state through supervisory authority over the Bank of Joseon, while at the same time attempting to dramatically reduce the role of Joseon Siksan Bank. The administrative authorities were in opposite positions over the control of finance in colonial Joseon.
The Bank of Joseon and Joseon Siksan Bank, which had the closest interest in reorganization, responded actively. First, the Bank of Joseon demanded entry into China as compensation for the loss of its vested interests in Manchuria. The authorities suggested Joseon as compensation for the bank’s withdrawal from Manchuria, but the Bank of Joseon demanded the larger market in China and sought to realize it by establishing an overseas bank called Dong-A Bank. Unlike the conception of the Ministry of Finance or the Japanese Government General of Korea, the Bank of Joseon had no intention to concentrate on Joseon. The Bank of Joseon argued that its concentration on Joseon was very likely to worsen the situation in Joseon and demanded the establishment of a large overseas bank with strong financing and expanded business areas. That is, the Bank of Joseon was not interested in expanding its business in Joseon, but with this opportunity, tried to realize its dream of becoming a huge overseas bank that it had pursued since its foundation.
On the other hand, Joseon Siksan Bank focused on maintaining the vested interests it had enjoyed as a central financial institution in Joseon. In particular, Joseon Siksan Bank criticized that the Ministry of Finance"s attempt to subordinate it to the Bank of Joseon through reorganization was an action that disregarded the reality of Joseon finance. Joseon Siksan Bank pursued unbalanced development with itself as the peak and rationalized it by citing the special circumstances of Joseon.
The Bank of Joseon and Joseon Siksan Bank, which had the closest interest in reorganization, responded actively. First, the Bank of Joseon demanded entry into China as compensation for the loss of its vested interests in Manchuria. The authorities suggested Joseon as compensation for the bank’s withdrawal from Manchuria, but the Bank of Joseon demanded the larger market in China and sought to realize it by establishing an overseas bank called Dong-A Bank. Unlike the conception of the Ministry of Finance or the Japanese Government General of Korea, the Bank of Joseon had no intention to concentrate on Joseon. The Bank of Joseon argued that its concentration on Joseon was very likely to worsen the situation in Joseon and demanded the establishment of a large overseas bank with strong financing and expanded business areas. That is, the Bank of Joseon was not interested in expanding its business in Joseon, but with this opportunity, tried to realize its dream of becoming a huge overseas bank that it had pursued since its foundation.
On the other hand, Joseon Siksan Bank focused on maintaining the vested interests it had enjoyed as a central financial institution in Joseon. In particular, Joseon Siksan Bank criticized that the Ministry of Finance"s attempt to subordinate it to the Bank of Joseon through reorganization was an action that disregarded the reality of Joseon finance. Joseon Siksan Bank pursued unbalanced development with itself as the peak and rationalized it by citing the special circumstances of Joseon.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 금융 통제력을 둘러싼 행정 당국의 상이한 입장
Ⅲ. 조선은행: 대형 해외은행 설립을 통한 중국으로의 진출 구상
Ⅳ. 조선식산은행: 조선의 중추금융기관으로서의 기득권 유지
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
谷口園 鄭象觀의 『史記』 애호와 그 의의 -｢讀馬史｣ 및 南漢朝와의 왕복 서한을 중심으로-
한국한문학연구
2024 .08
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
1915년 조선물산공진회에 나타난 식민 권력의 이미지 구축 시도 -미술관 전시를 중심으로
탐라문화
2020 .01
-
1910~20년대 식민지 조선에서 개최된 공진회와 박람회의 성격
전북사학
2018 .01
-
Moving Beyond Politics: Western Scholarship on Joseon
Korea Journal
2021 .09
-
김석범의 『만월(満月)』론 -제주4·3, 그 후로부터 50년-
일본문화학보
2022 .08
-
일제시기 조선은행 공정이율 결정 방식과 조선에서의 비판
한국사학보
2016 .05
-
1920년대 開闢社의 조선지식 수집과 조선연구 토대 구축 - ‘조선문화 기본조사’의 추진과정과 내용 분석을 중심으로
역사연구
2019 .06
-
柳宗悦の朝鮮理解の特質 ―朝鮮関連初期の著作を手がかりに―
일본문화학보
2020 .11
-
조선후기 刀劒 素材 科擧 答案사례에 대한 一考察 -｢劒策問｣과 ｢劒對策文｣을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
1920년대 문화사학자의 민족 자각론과 한국상고사 인식
역사와 담론
2023 .04
-
일제의 통계 조사와 조선인의 비판적 해석
사림
2015 .01
-
『朝鮮賦』의 한중일 간행과 유통
장서각
2015 .04
-
근대 초기 영문 잡지에 나타난 서양인의 ‘조선어’ 인식에 대하여 : The Korean Repository, The Korean Review를 중심으로
한국인물사연구
2016 .03
-
Subtle Changes in the Joseon’s Everyday Life Based on the Westerners’ Discourses (1800-1880)
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2019 .06
-
The Zhonghua Community Strategy in the Early Joseon Dynasty: The Establishment of Rituals and the Change in Ming’s Attitude toward Joseon
Korea Journal
2023 .12
-
‘조선’ 국호로 본 여말선초의 역사인식과 이상국가론
역사와현실
2018 .06
-
1930년대 전반 조선 미곡정책과 재조선일본인의 식민자본 ― ‘조선미곡창고주식회사’를 중심으로 ―
사림
2015 .01
-
[서평] 『조선 불교사상사: 유교의 시대를 가로지른 불교적 사유의 지형』[김용태, 2021, 성균관대학교 출판부]
한국사상사학
2021 .08
-
조선총독부 고적조사사업에 대한 평가와 인식 -패전 후 일본 학계의 동향을 중심으로-
한일관계사연구
2020 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
일제시기 조선은행 개조 논쟁과 그 함의 : 제국의 이상과 식민지 현실의 길항
조명근
한국사학보
2013
.05
1930년대 중후반 일제의 수리조합 정책을 통한 농촌통제 강화
박성섭
한국독립운동사연구
2017
.11
일제의 임야대부 정책과 그 성격 : 1910, 1920년대 대부 실태와 경영을 중심으로
강정원
,
최원규
한국민족문화
2016
.02
인구지표를 통해 본 우리나라의 도시화 성격 : 일제 강점기와 그 전후(前後) 시기의 비교
김흥순
한국지역개발학회지
2011
.06
일제하 조선 지방 세출의 구조와 추이, 1910~1936 - 대만과의 비교를 겸하여 -
문명기
중국근현대사연구
2021
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-001298686