지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 노동법이론실무학회 노동법포럼 노동법포럼 제44호
- 발행연도
- 2025.3
- 수록면
- 33 - 79 (47page)
- DOI
- 10.46329/LLF.2025.03.44.33
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article provides a retrospective analysis of Professor Jonghee Park's academic contributions, particularly focusing on the relevance of each study within the domain of individual labor law. By examining key research works in this area, the article highlights the significance and impact of Professor Park’s scholarship on labor law discourse.
Professor Park's research has consistently addressed the most pressing labor law issues at the time of publication. While this study limits its discussion to individual labor law, a similar pattern is evident in his research on collective labor law. Notably, his work on industrial unions during the early 2000s-when the transition to an industrial union system was in progress-provided critical insights. His studies on the concept of federations, internal relationships within federations, redefinition of union control based on contract law, distinctions between union reorganizations,
mergers, and splits, as well as his extensive analyses on collective bargaining legislation, have all significantly influenced labor law development in South Korea. His contributions include discussions on the confirmation of bargaining parties, delegation of bargaining authority, unification of bargaining channels, exclusive bargaining systems, the duty of fair representation, and the autonomy of agreements.
This article reassesses the trajectory of Professor Park’s research as an ongoing exploration of the “right” form of labor law. Over the past 30 years, labor legislation in South Korea has expanded rapidly in quantity; however, its sophistication remains insufficient, and many essential legislative issues remain unresolved. In this context, Professor Park has played a crucial role in filling legislative gaps through rigorous legal interpretation. His scholarship reflects a sustained effort to refine labor law, not merely through statutory expansion but also a nuanced interpretative approach.
Through this analysis, the article underscores the enduring relevance of Professor Park's work in shaping labor law discourse and legislative development in South Korea.
Professor Park's research has consistently addressed the most pressing labor law issues at the time of publication. While this study limits its discussion to individual labor law, a similar pattern is evident in his research on collective labor law. Notably, his work on industrial unions during the early 2000s-when the transition to an industrial union system was in progress-provided critical insights. His studies on the concept of federations, internal relationships within federations, redefinition of union control based on contract law, distinctions between union reorganizations,
mergers, and splits, as well as his extensive analyses on collective bargaining legislation, have all significantly influenced labor law development in South Korea. His contributions include discussions on the confirmation of bargaining parties, delegation of bargaining authority, unification of bargaining channels, exclusive bargaining systems, the duty of fair representation, and the autonomy of agreements.
This article reassesses the trajectory of Professor Park’s research as an ongoing exploration of the “right” form of labor law. Over the past 30 years, labor legislation in South Korea has expanded rapidly in quantity; however, its sophistication remains insufficient, and many essential legislative issues remain unresolved. In this context, Professor Park has played a crucial role in filling legislative gaps through rigorous legal interpretation. His scholarship reflects a sustained effort to refine labor law, not merely through statutory expansion but also a nuanced interpretative approach.
Through this analysis, the article underscores the enduring relevance of Professor Park's work in shaping labor law discourse and legislative development in South Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 총론적 고찰
Ⅲ. 노동법의 법원(法源)
Ⅳ. 근로기준법상 근로자 개념
Ⅴ. 임금과 근로시간
Ⅵ. 해고
Ⅶ. 기업변동
Ⅷ. 맺으며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
시대변혁기에 있어서 노동법의 역할
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
미군정기 노동법에 관한 연구
노동법학
2025 .03
-
새 정부의 노동정책과 법제도의 개선 과제
노동법학
2022 .06
-
교섭대표노조 결정 과정에서의 쟁점 - 1. 교섭창구단일화 절차 규정의 강행규범성, 2. 교섭창구단일화를 거치지 않고 단체협약을 체결한 경우 체결 노동조합의 지위-
노동법포럼
2015 .02
-
노동조합법상 근로자 개념 확대와 그 후속문제에 대한 단상
노동법학
2019 .12
-
교섭창구단일화와 개별교섭의 법적 문제
노동법포럼
2018 .02
-
미국 연방노동법의 건설산업 단체교섭 특례
노동법학
2023 .06
-
사용종속관계의 새로운 기준 및 평가
노동법논총
2020 .04
-
노동법의 규범구조와 근로권과 노동3권의 관계
원광법학
2019 .01
-
‘2018 행정부교섭’의 법적·실무상 쟁점 - 교섭창구 단일화, 지부교섭 위임, 절차합의서 등을 중심으로 -
법학연구
2019 .09
-
교섭단위분리제도의 실제적 운영과 법적 과제 - 부산지방노동위원회 2015. 6. 17. 2015단위19 현대중공업 교섭단위 분리 결정 -
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
中国集体合同制度的历史脉络及未来发展
중국법연구
2017 .01
-
원청사업주의 단체교섭의무와 실질적 지배력 판단기준 및 교섭사항
노동법학
2024 .12
-
노동참여의 헌법정치학과 노동헌법 판례
국제정치연구
2016 .12
-
복수노조의 교섭창구 단일화 제도에 관한 연구
한양법학
2015 .08
-
감정노동에 대한 노동법적 규율방안
노동법논총
2015 .12
-
단수노조 사업장에서 교섭창구단일화 절차의 이행 및 단수노조에 대한 교섭대표노조로서의 지위 인정 여부
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
고용형태 다양화와 노동법의 문제
법학연구
2019 .12
-
고용환경의 변화, 노동법의 위기와 대응 : 노동보호법의 인적 적용범위를 중심으로
노동법학
2018 .09
-
협약자치와 교섭창구단일화제도
노동법학
2022 .03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092610840