지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 노동법이론실무학회 노동법포럼 노동법포럼 제42호
- 발행연도
- 2024.7
- 수록면
- 35 - 61 (27page)
- DOI
- 10.46329/LLF.2024.07.42.35
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There is nothing realistically problematic for an employer to conduct voluntary retirement prior to dismissal for management. Therefore, it will not be legally acceptable to restrict or prohibit voluntary retirement to employers. However, by breaking the link between voluntary retirement and recommended resignation for employers who abuse voluntary retirement, it will be possible to prevent retirement against the will of workers in advance, and to promote a stable settlement of the retirement age of 60 guaranteed under the Elderly Employment Promotion Act.
On the other hand, when reviewing French legislation or Korea"s legislative proposals, voluntary retirement should be stipulated that it can only be implemented for an unspecified number of people after consultation with the representative of workers for management reasons. A meditation period should be given to allow withdrawal during the meditation period, but after the meditation period, the stability and trust of the transaction should be protected by preventing withdrawal even before the user expresses his or her intention to accept it. It should also include prohibiting illegal activities, such as giving disadvantages to their status for refusing to retire.
Finally, the structure of the labor law should be divided into the Labor Standards Act, which protects workers" "labor" and the Labor Contract Act, which protects workers" "contract". In addition to the Labor Standards Act, there is no difference between the reasons why Japan has enacted and implemented the Labor Contract Act and the large framework. Therefore, in the long run, it would be desirable to regulate voluntary retirement in the form of termination of agreement through a separate labor contract law from the viewpoint of contract protection.
On the other hand, when reviewing French legislation or Korea"s legislative proposals, voluntary retirement should be stipulated that it can only be implemented for an unspecified number of people after consultation with the representative of workers for management reasons. A meditation period should be given to allow withdrawal during the meditation period, but after the meditation period, the stability and trust of the transaction should be protected by preventing withdrawal even before the user expresses his or her intention to accept it. It should also include prohibiting illegal activities, such as giving disadvantages to their status for refusing to retire.
Finally, the structure of the labor law should be divided into the Labor Standards Act, which protects workers" "labor" and the Labor Contract Act, which protects workers" "contract". In addition to the Labor Standards Act, there is no difference between the reasons why Japan has enacted and implemented the Labor Contract Act and the large framework. Therefore, in the long run, it would be desirable to regulate voluntary retirement in the form of termination of agreement through a separate labor contract law from the viewpoint of contract protection.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 희망퇴직의 의의
Ⅲ. 희망퇴직에 관한 법적 쟁점
Ⅳ. 프랑스 2017년 노동법 개정내용 검토
Ⅴ. 희망퇴직에 관한 입법적 해결방안
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
구조조정시대에 희망퇴직의 운용에 관한 법적 소고
아주법학
2017 .08
-
합의해제와 제3자 보호
저스티스
2024 .08
-
행정조달계약에 있어서 공익(公益)을 위한 계약의 변경 및 해지에 관한 연구
法學論文集
2017 .01
-
근로형태의 다양화와 노동법의 대응
노동법포럼
2019 .02
-
우리나라의 협약자율과 노동법
법학연구
2021 .12
-
LABOR PROVISIONS IN TRADE AGREEMENTS : VIETNAM"S PARTICIPATION AND IMPLICATIONS
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2017 .11
-
[인력운영] 희망퇴직 과정에서 유의해야 할 법적 쟁점
노동법률
2024 .12
-
가맹사업법상 계약의 존속에 대한 규제
경쟁법연구
2019 .01
-
근로계약과 사적 자치의 재검토
노동법포럼
2020 .02
-
중국 계약법 상의 해제권에 관한 연구
한중사회과학연구
2016 .01
-
고용환경의 변화, 노동법의 위기와 대응 : 노동보호법의 인적 적용범위를 중심으로
노동법학
2018 .09
-
단체협약의 방식과 일반적 효력에 관한 고찰
법학연구
2022 .06
-
中国集体合同制度的历史脉络及未来发展
중국법연구
2017 .01
-
조약과 법적 구속력 없는 합의 간 차이에 대한 고찰
동아법학
2022 .02
-
미군정기 노동법에 관한 연구
노동법학
2025 .03
-
취업규칙과 근로계약의 효력상 우열관계 — 대법원 2019. 11. 14 선고 2018다200709 판결을 중심으로 —
노동법논총
2020 .04
-
시대변혁기에 있어서 노동법의 역할
노동법포럼
2017 .02
-
인공지능 시대의 도래에 따른 문제점 및 노동법적 쟁점 연구
법조
2017 .01
-
돌봄노동에 대한 노동법적 보호 필요성과 규율체계의 괴리 - 아이돌보미를 중심으로 -
노동법포럼
2025 .03
-
새 정부의 노동정책과 법제도의 개선 과제
노동법학
2022 .06
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-090304228