메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
송영진 (경찰대학)
저널정보
국제법평론회 국제법평론 국제법평론 제60호
발행연도
2021.10
수록면
269 - 282 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the past, State exercised its enforcement jurisdiction within its territory without any special problems. In particular, most of the criminal investigation, such as collecting evidence and arresting criminals, were carried out within the territory. In order to overcome the territorial limitation of enforcement jurisdiction, extradition and mutual legal assistance system have been developed. However, the development of information and communication technology makes it difficult to apply existing principles of jurisdiction to cyberspace. In particular, as cloud computing services become more common, cloud computing has led to what can be described as loss of location. Data stored in the cloud is divided into small pieces and distributed across multiple servers in multiple jurisdictions. Therefore, it is nearly not able to detect or identify the physical location of data. Law enforcement access to cloud data raises issue of jurisdiction, if the data is stored in another jurisdiction or it is uncertain in which jurisdiction the data is located. Where law enforcement unilaterally seeks to collect data stored in the cloud, it may be questionable whether such law enforcement access to transborder data constitutes an extraterritorial exercise of enforcement jurisdiction. If a state requires the execution of criminal investigations outside its territory, it needs to cooperate transnationally with the state where the data is located and request mutual legal assistance from that state. However, there is still a limitation in that mutual legal assistance process is complex and lengthy. It is not fully settled yet whether the prohibition of extraterritorial enforcement also applies to law enforcement access to transborder data or remote searches on computer networks located abroad. As such, in the absence of international legal framework on law enforcement access to transborder data, states rely on unilateral solutions, either legislatively or practically. In order to enhance legal stability and ensure individual freedom and human rights, it is necessary to clearly establish limitations of international law related to the scope of the exercise of enforcement jurisdiction. In order to find these international legal solutions, it is important to set the right direction for discussion based on the state practices and international debates. Based on comparative legal analysis of various implementations of international organizations and states, this study classifies the methods of law enforcement access to cloud data as direct and indirect collection. In reviewing and discussing international legal framework on law enforcement access to extraterritorial data, the following factors need to be considered. These include the location of data, consent of the person who has legal authority to access to data, nationality or location of the data subject or service provider, methods of data collection, the severity and urgency of the crime, and the possibility of conflict with data protection regulation. Ultimately, the issue of law enforcement access to extraterritorial data must be addressed at the international level through clear legal standards. This international legal effort will address the problem of legal uncertainty, dispel concerns of violation of state sovereignty and enable effective international cooperation in collecting digital evidence and fight against transnational cybercrime.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0