메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김형미 (제주대학교) 강경희 (제주대학교)
저널정보
한국생물교육학회 생물교육 생물교육 제49권 제4호
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
471 - 485 (15page)
DOI
10.15717/bioedu.2021.49.4.471

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (9)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and analyze pre-service biology teacher’s writing using the evaluation rubrics by science writing types. Evaluation rubric is an evaluation scale that allows students to clearly perform tasks by presenting the evaluation criteria required by the tasks. In this study, the rubric used for the evaluation of science writing was revised and supplemented of the existing evaluation rubric according to categories by dividing them into explanatory and editorial types, and applied to the pre- service biology teachers after performing science writing. Through four writing activities, the pre-service biology teachers were more and more aware of the presentation materials among the evaluation categories of rubric, so they actively utilized the presentation materials for their writing, and applied the contents of learning about the basic structure of writing by type. The science and content categories, which can be said to be the core of science writing, showed a gradual improvement as the writing task progressed. In particular, four of the 13 pre-service biology teachers showed a gradual improvement in writing evaluation results. Above all, the results of explanatory science writing twice improved the evaluation results of eight pre-service biology teachers. Although it is meaningful in that it was able to evaluate various writing types by developing evaluation rubrics as explanatory and editorial types and applying them to writing tasks, there is a limit that pre-service biology teachers did not have enough time to learn the characteristics of the structure by writing types as writing education and writing activities were carried out for a short period of time. If various types of writing learning are done through continuous science writing education, evaluation rubrics will be presented in the future, and the task will be efficiently performed by gradually recognizing the evaluation factors and understanding the characteristics of science writing. In addition, if evaluation rubric is completed by reflecting the characteristics of writing by type, it will be used as effective data for performing science writing, evaluating and improving not only pre-service biology teachers but also school classes.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0