메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박경자 (전남대학교) 윤민석 (전남대학교)
저널정보
한국인터넷전자상거래학회 인터넷전자상거래연구 인터넷전자상거래연구 제22권 제1호
발행연도
2022.2
수록면
1 - 19 (19page)
DOI
10.37272/JIECR.2022.02.22.1.1

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study focuses on the phenomenon of choice overload to be experienced by consumers as the number of alternatives for online shopping environment is increased. It drew "excessive products, information and channels" as factors related with the alternative overload in online shopping. It attempts an empirical research by structuring the process in which decision postponement comes to be determined, with consumer confusion as a psychological factor and shopping fatigue as a physical/cognitive factor, derived from the choice overload. In order to secure the objectivity of data, some tools with validity and reliability verified in a previous study were used to design the subjects to be surveyed and methods, through group interviews about online shopping. A total of 230 people participated in the questionnaire and 209 copies among them were analyzed by using SPSS and AMOS.
The main findings are as follows: First, the higher the perceptive level of "excessive products and information", the worse the "consumer confusion", while there was no significant relation between excessive channels and consumer confusion. Second, both "excessive products and channels" had positive relations with "shopping fatigue", and the more the perceived number of alternatives of sale channels, the worse the shopping fatigue. Third, the higher the perceptive level of "excessive products and channels" and the "shopping fatigue", the higher the likelihood of "decision postponement". This study thus found that "excessive products" are the main factor causing consumer confusion and fatigue about ‘online shopping", and that "shopping fatigue" is a critical factor resulting in the decision postponement". Specific contents and debates of the findings were added to Discussion and Conclusion. The findings are thought to contribute to understanding of choice overload and online consumers" choice behavior and be used as basic data for following-up studies.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 가설
Ⅳ. 실증분석
Ⅴ. 토의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-323-001089874