메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김동혁 (경일대학교) 황순평 (서울 성동경찰서)
저널정보
한국경찰법학회 경찰법연구 경찰법연구 제13권 제1호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
223 - 246 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Speedy trial are very important values of criminal procedure in terms of finding truth and Due process of law. The constitution guarantees the right to receive the Speedy trial as the fundamental haman rights. Summary judgment actualizes the principle of the Speedy trial. But there is critical opinion that Summary judgment sacrifice other values because of pursuing the Speedy trial. Summary judgment aims at the crime in which an evidence is clear and which the nature of a crime is slight. A prosecutor doesn’t prosecute, and the chief of police station claims a trial to a court directly. The judge of the court can sentence a defendant to the punishment including the fine of under 200,000 wons, detention, or a minor fine. The chief of police station executes the penalty which the judge of the court sentenced. This paper’s purpose solves the practical affairs on trouble which police officers in charge of Summary judgment have experienced. So, I implemented questionnaire study about them, and I arranged and opend that results and analyzed the results of survey and presented substantial solutions. Survey is as follows. The maintenance or abolition of Summary judgment(1), Who should exercise the right of prosecution of Summary judgment(2), Subject of Summary judgment(3 to 5), The abuse of the rignt of prosecution of Summary judgment(6), The absence of the defendant and method of the trial(7 to 10). I wish this paper contributes to the operating system and that the unity of summary conviction.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0