메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
네유룬 (중국인민대학) 박상식 (경상대학교)
저널정보
경상대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제28권 제3호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
85 - 100 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The criminal procedure law of the social risk as a legal concept is introduced, the criminal suspect or defendant criminal coercive measures of social risk assessment and is able to correctly apply the core part of, but in the entire code "risk society" this statement has three different meanings, suitable for different situation. The inconsistencies of legal concepts and meanings can easily lead to ambiguity and even errors in the understanding and application of law, and finally affect the realization of legal authority. The implementation of the compulsory measures aimed to eliminate the criminal suspect or defendant sabotage of litigation, in order to ensure the normal conduct of criminal procedure, rather than defend society from other possible danger, only because of the criminal suspect or defendant "risk society" or "personal" dangerous work on the criminal compulsory measures is beyond the scope of system and unreasonable. The setting of different criminal compulsory measures should be based on the possibility of hindering litigation. When the standard is replaced by social danger, the purpose of the compulsory measures will be biased from "litigation protection" to "defense society". From the perspective of the realization of legal order, the task of social defense in the criminal procedure stage should be accomplished by security measures rather than criminal compulsory measures. 30) Security measure is based on the purpose of a "personal risk" or "risk society" the actor was restricted rights, realize the specific prevention in order to achieve the purpose of defending social security, it has to do with the current compulsory measures in criminal procedure law about the risks of social regulation has a purpose and on the condition of consistency, compulsory measures shall be for the purpose of the situation, build system of the corresponding security measures shall be applicable. But because of security law in our country at present stage is very scattered, no system of system, the author proposed to security disciplinary measures stipulated in the criminal law or for a single or a new amendment of criminal law, criminal law system to make provision for security system, security of existing system of punishment measures included in the system. To be specific, the applicable condition of security measure including objectively the offender has implemented a social behavior, subjective behavior person based on their personality or the living environment, and fully show that it has once again the possibility of illegal and criminal behavior, for the criminal suspect or defendant, once has the "evidence of criminal facts", and to prove its likely committing the behavior again, then to security disciplinary measures to restrict the personal freedom. Only in this way can the status of criminal coercive measures as procedural safeguard measures be clearly defined, the boundary between procedural safeguard and social defense measures be clarified, and a perfect and purposeful system of criminal coercive measures be formed.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0