메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법학회 형사법연구 형사법연구 제20권 제4호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
311 - 334 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Revised Korean Criminal Procedure Law of 2008 has a lot of adversarial features. One of the remarkable features is an adoption of Anglo-American style discovery and disclosure. In Part Ⅱ, I analyze the relationship between the constitutional court's decision of 1997 and the provision of newly revised criminal procedure law's discovery clauses. In Part Ⅲ of this article I explore the basic features of the provision of newly revised criminal procedure law's discovery clauses, and Part Ⅳ reviews various interpretational issues. Korea's new rule follows a global trend of expanded prosecutorial discovery in criminal cases. Prosecutors are bound, upon request, to disclose all exculpatory evidence that they are going to use at trial. This article addresses the provisions and ramifications of the new reciprocal criminal discovery rule in Korea. Although the rule provides for a “two-way street", its significance lies in its expansion of discovery by the criminal defendant. In Part Ⅴ, I tried to criticize legislative failures and flaws. A relevant discussion will be provided of the history of criminal discovery, development and present status of the rule in Korea, and a prediction of what Korean practitioners are now facing. In Part Ⅵ, I summarized my findings and proposes actions that police, prosecutors, and defense attorneys should take to ameliorate the problem. Above all, I concluded that the more strong sanctions for prosecution's violations of criminal discovery rules should be added.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0