지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 9 - 147 (140page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Currently, the criminal justice of Korea suffered from the most difficult problem that the machinery of the law was short of case processing ability enough to deal with increased cases. All of the societies had actual limit on judicial sources that could take care of criminal cases. The machinery of the law was forced to control the input of cases depending upon its processing capacity, considering limited resources of the trial of criminal cases. The paper examined development ways of the summary criminal trial system based on ‘controls of the input of cases’, and suggested solutions from point of view of short-term and long-term measures.
At first, the short-term measure could discover problems to make systematic improvement. In other words, this study investigated that the summary criminal trial procedure of current laws and regulations allocated cases properly at all of criminal procedures, and suggested reasonable management ways of available systems under current laws and regulations when a problem was detected.
On the other hand, the long-term measure could decrease total number of cases at criminal procedure to alleviate overall burden of criminal trial. The measure might be classified into two: Firstly, the criminal procedure could decriminalize minor crimes greatly to reduce the input of criminal cases. Secondly, the procedure might process types of remaining crimes depending upon weight of each case.
The criminal procedure might not punish minor crimes to decrease the input of cases and to decriminalize minor crimes. The decriminalization might be made at two stages, that is, the legislation stage and the legal application stage: The former might adopt conversion of the fine into non-penal fine, the use of notification disposal, and the introduction of Ordnungswidrigkeitsgesetz(OWiG), while the latter might do decriminalization by curtailed interpretation and the use of the Principle of Discretionary Prosecution, etc.
This study examined dual systems of case processing procedure. To solve limitation of case processing ability of the machinery of the law that could not meet the increase of cases, almost all of criminal justice systems of advanced countries followed dual system of case processing to alleviate job burden of the machinery of the law and to process minor crimes quickly and conveniently and assure of the people's rights. In other words, the dual system processed minor cases simply and quickly depending upon the weight of each case under large flow of processing of criminal cases, and put reserve power intensively into important cases to manage ‘choice and concentration’ well. The paper described not only introduction of summary court being in charge of minor cases by the ‘choice and concentration’ but also recruitment of judicial officers and prosecutors at the summary court and prosecutor's office, and investigated expansion of associated facilities.
At first, the short-term measure could discover problems to make systematic improvement. In other words, this study investigated that the summary criminal trial procedure of current laws and regulations allocated cases properly at all of criminal procedures, and suggested reasonable management ways of available systems under current laws and regulations when a problem was detected.
On the other hand, the long-term measure could decrease total number of cases at criminal procedure to alleviate overall burden of criminal trial. The measure might be classified into two: Firstly, the criminal procedure could decriminalize minor crimes greatly to reduce the input of criminal cases. Secondly, the procedure might process types of remaining crimes depending upon weight of each case.
The criminal procedure might not punish minor crimes to decrease the input of cases and to decriminalize minor crimes. The decriminalization might be made at two stages, that is, the legislation stage and the legal application stage: The former might adopt conversion of the fine into non-penal fine, the use of notification disposal, and the introduction of Ordnungswidrigkeitsgesetz(OWiG), while the latter might do decriminalization by curtailed interpretation and the use of the Principle of Discretionary Prosecution, etc.
This study examined dual systems of case processing procedure. To solve limitation of case processing ability of the machinery of the law that could not meet the increase of cases, almost all of criminal justice systems of advanced countries followed dual system of case processing to alleviate job burden of the machinery of the law and to process minor crimes quickly and conveniently and assure of the people's rights. In other words, the dual system processed minor cases simply and quickly depending upon the weight of each case under large flow of processing of criminal cases, and put reserve power intensively into important cases to manage ‘choice and concentration’ well. The paper described not only introduction of summary court being in charge of minor cases by the ‘choice and concentration’ but also recruitment of judicial officers and prosecutors at the summary court and prosecutor's office, and investigated expansion of associated facilities.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 비교법적 검토
제3장 현행법상 간이형사재판: 현황과 문제점
제4장 간이형사재판제도의 발전적 정비방향
제5장 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
형사정책연구 30년의 성과와 과제(II) : 형사법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2019 .03
-
中國 刑法上 犯罪過程에서의 犯罪形態
법학연구
2005 .06
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 조선 형사법제와 현행 형법과의 비교법적 검토(각론)
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
사회변동과 형법의 과제
비교형사법연구
2010 .01
-
형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
범죄피해자 보호제도에 관한 고찰
피해자학연구
2004 .01
-
새로운 범죄대응전략으로서 화해조정체계구축방안(Ⅱ) - 형사화해조정체계의 구축을 위한 법적ㆍ제도적 정비방안 총괄보고서
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2009 .12
-
중국 개정 형사소송법에서의 간이절차 연구
원광법학
2013 .01
-
2011년도 형법ㆍ형사소송법 및 형사특별법 제ㆍ개정안 분석과 입법정책 개선방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2011 .12
-
형사특별법 정비방안(4) 특정경제범죄가중처벌법등에관한법률
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
형사사법절차상 형사합의 관행의 실태분석과 제도화 방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
우리나라 형사화해제도에 대한 검토
동아법학
2009 .08
-
조선시대의 형사법제 연구 : 총칙의 현대 형사법 편제에 따른 재정립
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2015 .12
-
형사사법 개혁의 방향과 과제 : 국민의 사법참가를 중심으로
한양법학
2011 .05
-
한국형법 개정의 올바른 방향 -형법총칙을 중심으로-
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
형사특별법의 입법구조와 이론적 기초
비교형사법연구
2009 .01
-
[형사특별법 정비방안(9)] 금융/재정/노동/사회풍속 분야
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
형사정책과 사법개혁에 관한 조사, 연구 및 평가 (Ⅰ) : [3] 사법개혁에 대한 평가와 전망
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2007 .12
-
중국에서 ‘惩办与宽大相结合’에 관한 형사정책의 형성 과정과 현황
중국법연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003836273