지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The use of the ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) has been widespread for language testing even though they have been criticized by researchers of second language acquisition and testing since their genesis in 1982. Much of this criticism has focused on reliability and validity for the OPI. In light of this, the purpose of this paper to identify the criticism on the oral proficiency interview and to provide recommendations for other proficiency test areas of future study. This paper presents (1) an overview of research carried out on the ACTFL OPI and Guidelines, (2) a summary of the criticism leveled against them and discussions on other points of view over the criticism learned from research, and (3) recommendations such as interrater reliability, raters’ training session, elicitation process, comparison with other oral proficiency test, analytic assessment, oral proficiency interview for multi-purposes for further research.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
ACTFL / 1999 / Oral Proficiency Interview Tester Training Manual / ACTFL
Alderson,J.C. / 1991 / Language testing in the 1990s: How far have we come? How much further have we to go? in : Current developments in language testing / SAMEO Regional Language centr
American Educational Research Associatio / 1999 / Standards for educational and psychological testing / Authors
Bachman, L. F. / 1988 / Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview / Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10 (2) : 149 ~ 164
Bachman,L.F. / 1986 / The Evaluation of Communicative Language Proficiency: A Critique of the ACTFL Oral Interview / Modern Language Journal 70 (4) : 380 ~ 390
Alderson,J.C. / 1991 / Language testing in the 1990s: How far have we come? How much further have we to go? in : Current developments in language testing / SAMEO Regional Language centr
American Educational Research Associatio / 1999 / Standards for educational and psychological testing / Authors
Bachman, L. F. / 1988 / Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview / Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10 (2) : 149 ~ 164
Bachman,L.F. / 1986 / The Evaluation of Communicative Language Proficiency: A Critique of the ACTFL Oral Interview / Modern Language Journal 70 (4) : 380 ~ 390
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
멀티미디어 활용 군사영어 말하기 평가(ME-OPI) 개발
멀티미디어 언어교육
2017 .01
-
OPI訓練生における「どう・どんな質問」の使用実態-「質問の型」からの調査-
일본어교육연구
2019 .01
-
Man or Machine? Stakeholders’ Views on Foreign Language Oral Proficiency Testing in Korea
외국어교육연구
2009 .01
-
컴퓨터 모의구술능력 평가의 음성인식기술 활용 가능도
멀티미디어 언어교육
2004 .01
-
Assessing Conversation Ability in Proficiency Tests : Can Group Discussion Tests Do the Trick?
외국어교육연구
2009 .01
-
내러티브 기반의 문화 간 의사소통 평가 연구
한국언어문화학
2019 .01
-
OPI発話における学習者の「聞き手の反応」
일본어교육연구
2009 .01
-
The Relationship between L2 Use outside of Class and Oral Proficiency Development
영어어문교육
2011 .01
-
The Need for Level-based Criteria in the Assessment of Oral Proficiency
영어어문교육
2009 .01
-
인터뷰평가의 담화분석 연구
한국어 교육
2006 .01
-
東アジアにおける外国語教育と口頭能力評価の在り方
일본어교육연구
2009 .01
-
Identifying Prosodic Features in Heritage Learners of Japanese: A Study based on OPI Interviews
외국어교육연구
2020 .01
-
Study on the Question Types of the Korean Language Proficiency Test and Korean Language Proficiency of Learners at the Intermediate Level: Focusing on analysis of the grade 3 written test
한국언어문화학
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0