메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제24권 제3호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
65 - 86 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Today, the transferability of a claim has been definitely established. The demand of money and an Obligatory right would be one of the reasons to admit the transferability of the claim. In a sense, a claim has no transferability in itself. However, The extension of the transferability of a claim become necessary conditions is not only considered as transferable but also acknowledged as security at present-day. The present study and a(judicial)precedent deals with the cases where the right to protest in the part of transferees is controversial. The issues about the right to protest for the transfer are examined as below in the present study. For example, the interrelationship and interpretation of Sub-Section 1 and 2 of Section 451 of the Civil Law analyzed as a general problem of the transferee's right to protest. And, the right to protest for the transfer and the legal relationship in case double transactions of a claim-including transfer with the establishment of the right of pledge on a claim, or transfer with the seizure of a claim - are examined transferees' right to protest is dealt with when he obtains a claim that is not transferable by a contract the debtor's right to protest. above all. a setoff of the debtor is also dealt with a criticism Uniquely, it is said that a setoff is a device under Civil Code, designed to use the judicial system efficiently, to remove the inconvenience and to spare the expenses of the parties. In other words, a setoff right is, provided in Civil Code, is the typical authority that contribute to such a purposes

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0