지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines the patterns and characteristics of the "politics of protest" by civil society in South Korea after its democratic transition in 1987. The paper first provides a theoretical overview of the relationship between democracy/democratization and social protest as is discussed in the existing literature. Protest is considered to be conducive to daily political practices in established democracies, by supplementing conventional party politics. Protest is also assumed to contribute to democratic transition by promoting authoritarian breakdown and facilitating democratic reforms. However, the role of protest in nascent democracies undergoing democratic consolidation still remains unclear in the literature.
Utilizing a recently compiled dataset called Protest Event Database Archive Korea (PEDAK), this paper tries to explore the relationship between social protest and democratic consolidation. Specifically, this paper analyzes the 1989-2003 period in terms of the number of protests, the number of protest participants, the socio-vocational categories of the participants, the type of organizing/sponsoring organizations, and the chosen protest methods/strategies.
The number of social protests in South Korea after democratization has not decreased significantly and remains at a comparatively high level. Medium-scale protests have decreased, whereas small- and large-scale protests have increased. In terms of the socio-vocational categories of protest participants, students and laborers have decreased, while white-collar workers and public servants have increased. "New social movement" groups such as environmental, womens' and peace movement organizations superseded trade unions as the most active civil society group organizing/sponsoring social protests. "Disruptive" methods are still being preferred to peaceful methods by social movement groups in South Korea.
All in all, the politics of protest in post-transitional South Korea represents both continuities and changes as compared with that of the pre-transition period. The persistence of protest politics in South Korea holds important implications for the future of South Korean democracy. Future research projects should examine whether the persistence of social protest is an enduring, if not perpetual, feature of South Korean democracy and, if so, what kind of effects contentious politics will have on the quality and type of democracy in South Korea.
Utilizing a recently compiled dataset called Protest Event Database Archive Korea (PEDAK), this paper tries to explore the relationship between social protest and democratic consolidation. Specifically, this paper analyzes the 1989-2003 period in terms of the number of protests, the number of protest participants, the socio-vocational categories of the participants, the type of organizing/sponsoring organizations, and the chosen protest methods/strategies.
The number of social protests in South Korea after democratization has not decreased significantly and remains at a comparatively high level. Medium-scale protests have decreased, whereas small- and large-scale protests have increased. In terms of the socio-vocational categories of protest participants, students and laborers have decreased, while white-collar workers and public servants have increased. "New social movement" groups such as environmental, womens' and peace movement organizations superseded trade unions as the most active civil society group organizing/sponsoring social protests. "Disruptive" methods are still being preferred to peaceful methods by social movement groups in South Korea.
All in all, the politics of protest in post-transitional South Korea represents both continuities and changes as compared with that of the pre-transition period. The persistence of protest politics in South Korea holds important implications for the future of South Korean democracy. Future research projects should examine whether the persistence of social protest is an enduring, if not perpetual, feature of South Korean democracy and, if so, what kind of effects contentious politics will have on the quality and type of democracy in South Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 한국 민주화와 시민사회의 항의의 정치
Ⅱ. 이론적 검토 : 민주화와 사회항의의 상관관계
Ⅲ. 자료 및 방법론
Ⅳ. 분석 : 민주화 이후 항의정치의 전개
Ⅴ. 항의의 정치와 ‘쟁론적 민주주의’(contentious democracy)의 탐색
참고문헌
abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
항의가 정책변화에 미치는 영향 분석 : 환경부문을 중심으로
한국사회와 행정연구
2010 .11
-
Political Protest in South Africa during the Process of Democratization
세계지역연구논총
2006 .01
-
Candlelight Protests in South Korea : The Legacies of Authoritarianism and Democratization
사회과학연구논총
2018 .04
-
Protests And Protest Policing In The U. S.-Police Organizational Culture And Responses(2007년 학술대회 발표논문)
한국경찰학회보
2007 .01
-
The material culture of social movement : The performance of artifacts in Korean protests
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2015 .12
-
인천의 5·3 민주항쟁과 한국의 민주화
인천학연구
2014 .08
-
한국사회에서 저항의 고조기의 정체성 정치의 특성 : 1970~1980년대 저항정체성 담론과 광주항쟁
경제와사회
2011 .06
-
Contentious Politics in Contemporary Russia: Protest Movement of 2011-2013
러시아연구
2014 .01
-
海上 集會·示威의 合理的 規律을 위한 一考察
법학연구
2001 .12
-
촛불의 운동정치와 87년 체제의 ‘이중 전환’
경제와사회
2018 .03
-
Student Attitudes towards Nuclear Energy and the Lack of Protest Mobilization in South Korea
사회과학연구
2014 .12
-
Protest-State Interaction : A VAR Analysis of the French Labor Movement
국제정치논총
2009 .12
-
한국 민주화운동의 전략과 프레임
한국사회학
2018 .11
-
사회운동의 폭력성 구조화 : 억압과 저항의 폭력적 상호작용, 1960~ 1987년
경제와사회
2017 .09
-
What Does the Internet Really Do for Social Movements? The Case of 2008 Candlelight Protest in Korea : 인터넷 이용과 사회운동 참여
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2009 .12
-
‘성주 사드배치 반대운동’의 전개와 성격 변화 : 님비운동의 자기변형과 저항공동체의 재편
경제와사회
2019 .09
-
인터넷 항의와 정치참여, 그리고 민주적 함의 : 2008년 촛불시위 사례
민주주의와 인권
2010 .12
-
누가 왜 광장의 정치에 참여하는가? : 남아공 시민들의 시위 참여 결정요인에 대한 경험적 분석
사회과학연구논총
2017 .10
-
어음(수표)항변에 관한 연구
외법논집
2013 .01
-
Korea’s Candlelight Protests in Context : Evidence from the Asian Barometer Survey and Global Events Data
평화연구
2019 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
시민사회, 정치사회, 민주적 책임성 : 민주화 이후 한국 시민사회의 정치개혁 운동
임혁백
한일공동연구총서
2006
.08
한국 시민사회의 참여정치 구조 : ‘87년 체제’의 시민사회
박해광
민주주의와 인권
2010
.08
중산층과 이중적 시민사회 : 중산층의 쇠퇴와 시민사회의 변동
김호기
한국사회학회 기타간행물
2006
.05
한국 시민사회의 정치과정과 성격변화 : 1990년대 이후 시민사회의 갈등적 제도화
홍성태
,
신종화
민주주의와 인권
2007
.04
한국 민주주의의 이행과 공고화 과정 분석
김영태
사회과학연구
2006
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-015956487