메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경쟁법학회 경쟁법연구 경쟁법연구 제37권
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
309 - 335 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently, in the JASRAC(Japanese Society for Rights of Authors, Composers, and Publishers) cases, Japanese courts ruled to the effect that third party can have the standing to sue for annulment the decision of the Japanese Fair Trade Commission(JFTC). These cases are significant because the issue of the third party standing to sue in the competition law proceedings has not been subject to extensive judicial review or academic discussion in Japan, and the issue also has a significant implication for the sound development of competition law enforcement in Korea. The complainant in the JASRAC case(e-License) was not the respondent of the JFTC decision, but the sole competitor of the JASRAC which was harmed by the exclusionary conduct of the JASRAC. After the JFTC rescinded its cease-and-desist order against JASRAC, the e-License, although it was a third party concerning the proceeding, filed an action for the annulment of the JFTC decision to the Tokyo High Court. Tokyo High Court, whose judgment was later upheld by the Japanese Supreme Court, extensively discussed the issue of third-party standing to sue then recognized the standing to sue of the e-License. This article will closely examine the reasoning of the Japanese courts, and discuss whether the third party should have the standing to sue for the annulment of the KFTC decision from the various perspective. JASRAC judgment of the Tokyo High Court is notable in two respects. The court interpreted the various provisions in the Japanese Antimonopoly Act protect not only the public interest to promote competition but also the private interest of the competitor to engage in fair and free competition. And to address the concern for the abusive litigation, the court provided the limiting principle on the scope of the third-party standing, which requires the directness and significance of the harm to the competitor. It is similar with the reasoning of the Korean Supreme Court the demands for the third party to file administrative litigation to suffer from harm to the individual, direct and specific interest, although not about competition law case, This article will explore whether it is necessary to allow the third party to appeal in the competition law proceeding to supplement the deficiency of the public enforcement and to overcome the limits of the private enforcement. And it will examine from the perspective of remedial balance, if the respondent in the KFTC decision can appeal to the court, a competitor who is the victim of the anticompetitive conduct should have the opportunity to appeal to the KFTC decision to restore competitive process and to get the injury relieved.
#Standing to Sue of the Third Party #JASRAC Case #Legal Interest #Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act #Administrative Litigation #Action for Annulment #Constitutional Petition #Eligibility for Filing Petition #Relevance with One's Own Right.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0