지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 96 (96page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to craft possible resolutions for the sunset provision of long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities. In this study, legal system and government policy related to the urban planning sunset system were first examined, and the status quo and management conditions of long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities were analyzed. Upon the analyses, this research identifies the problems and agendas of sunset provision of the long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities, and propose the responsive strategies.
In 2000, urban planning facility sunset clause was introduced through the amendment of the Urban Planning Act. If implemented, sunset clause of urban planning facilities nullifies the proposed project of the facilities of which the installment did not take place for 20 years since the planning(designation and determination).
As of December 31, 2017, 13,749 urban planning facilities have not been installed for over 10 years since the planning, 102.3㎢ area-wise, and presumably the total cost of implementing the long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities reaches 33.3 trillion won.
Out of the facilities, 4,647 urban planning facilities with the area of 56.7㎢ were not installed for 20 or more years after the determination, and will lose effect by July 2020. This amounts to 33.8% of the total number of long-term unexecuted facilities, and 55.4% of the total area. Estimated project cost to implement the facilities is about 13 trillion won, which accounts for 40% of total project cost.
Among the long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities, roads have the highest percentage of numbers of facilities that are subject to validation due to more than 20 years of nonenforcement: 4,067 out of 10,329 long-term unexecuted roads are lost effect, reaching 39.4%. Parks have the largest target area: 30.3㎢ out of 41.2㎢ long-term unexplored parks are targeted for validation, which accounts for 76.3%. Also, parks have the highest enforcement cost: the projected cost is 4,817.2 billion won, which is 51.6% of the total project cost of 9,332.7 billion won for the long-term uncovered parks.
The authority of Gyeonggi provincial Government to directly manage long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities is limited, since the control for the installation and management of urban planning facilities is delegated to the municipal governments. However, provincial Government needs to provide administrative․ financial support to ensure smooth implementation of the long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities and the sunset provision.
It is necessary to amend the law and improve the system secure the supply of funds from Development Charges and Regional Development Fund. Moreover, the City Planning Commission needs to revise the standards of the Urban Planning Committee and establish guidelines for installing and dismantling the long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities.
In 2000, urban planning facility sunset clause was introduced through the amendment of the Urban Planning Act. If implemented, sunset clause of urban planning facilities nullifies the proposed project of the facilities of which the installment did not take place for 20 years since the planning(designation and determination).
As of December 31, 2017, 13,749 urban planning facilities have not been installed for over 10 years since the planning, 102.3㎢ area-wise, and presumably the total cost of implementing the long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities reaches 33.3 trillion won.
Out of the facilities, 4,647 urban planning facilities with the area of 56.7㎢ were not installed for 20 or more years after the determination, and will lose effect by July 2020. This amounts to 33.8% of the total number of long-term unexecuted facilities, and 55.4% of the total area. Estimated project cost to implement the facilities is about 13 trillion won, which accounts for 40% of total project cost.
Among the long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities, roads have the highest percentage of numbers of facilities that are subject to validation due to more than 20 years of nonenforcement: 4,067 out of 10,329 long-term unexecuted roads are lost effect, reaching 39.4%. Parks have the largest target area: 30.3㎢ out of 41.2㎢ long-term unexplored parks are targeted for validation, which accounts for 76.3%. Also, parks have the highest enforcement cost: the projected cost is 4,817.2 billion won, which is 51.6% of the total project cost of 9,332.7 billion won for the long-term uncovered parks.
The authority of Gyeonggi provincial Government to directly manage long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities is limited, since the control for the installation and management of urban planning facilities is delegated to the municipal governments. However, provincial Government needs to provide administrative․ financial support to ensure smooth implementation of the long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities and the sunset provision.
It is necessary to amend the law and improve the system secure the supply of funds from Development Charges and Regional Development Fund. Moreover, the City Planning Commission needs to revise the standards of the Urban Planning Committee and establish guidelines for installing and dismantling the long-term unexecuted urban planning facilities.
목차
[표지]
[정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구 배경 및 목적
2. 연구 범위 및 방법
3. 선행연구 검토
[제2장 장기미집행 도시·군계획시설 관련 제도]
1. 도시·군계획시설의 지정 및 관리
2. 장기미집행 도시·군계획시설 해소 관련 제도
3. 중앙정부 정책방향
[제3장 장기미집행 도시·군계획시설의 현황 및 관리실태]
1. 장기미집행 도시·군계획시설 현황
2. 실효대상 장기미집행 도시·군계획시설 현황
3. 장기미집행 도시·군계획시설 관리실태
[제4장 장기미집행 도시·군계획시설 일몰 해제에 따른 경기도 대응방안]
1. 장기미집행시설 일몰 해제에 따른 대응과제
2. 장기미집행시설 해소를 위한 지원방안
3. 일몰 해제 후 관리방안
[제5장 결론 및 정책제언]
1. 결론
2. 정책제언
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
경기도 장기미집행 도시계획시설 해소를 위한중장기적 정책방향
정책연구
2017 .06
-
장기 미집행 도시·군 계획시설과 도시자연공원(구역)의 정책적 개선방안에 관한 연구
감정평가학논집
2020 .01
-
장기미집행 근린공원의 가치평가를 통한 공원일몰제 대응방향 수립
휴양및경관연구
2019 .01
-
AHP분석을 이용한 장기미집행 도시공원의 일몰제로 인한 문제점의 상대적 중요도에 관한 연구
부동산학보
2019 .01
-
민간공원조성 특례사업에 관한 인식 연구
주거환경
2019 .06
-
미집행 도시계획시설 합리적 조정 및 집행력 제고 방안 연구
감사논집
2017 .01
-
장기미집행 시설녹지 보상 우선순위 기준 정립방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2015 .12
-
기반시설과 도시계획시설의 관계
행정법연구
2024 .11
-
도시공원 일몰제에 따른 생태네트워크 변화 분석: 부산광역시를 대상으로
환경영향평가
2018 .01
-
데이터기반 도시계획을 위한 도시변화 모니터링 기초연구
한국지역개발학회지
2023 .03
-
여건변화에 따른 도시계획시설의 주요 쟁점과 과제
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2018 .12
-
Identifying Priority Management Area for Unexecuted Urban Parks in Long-Term by Considering the Pattern of Green Infrastructure
환경정책
2019 .03
-
도시계획시설의 공간적 범위 결정제도 개선방향 연구: 여객자동차터미널을 중심으로
도시재생
2018 .06
-
도시계획에 관한 영국 법원의 역할과 제도적 변천에 관한 연구
건설법연구
2024 .09
-
도시계획과 커뮤니티계획의 융합방향 연구
정책연구
2016 .09
-
경기도 맞춤형 생활환경 개선사업 지원 방안 연구
정책연구
2022 .11
-
우리나라 도시계획 패러다임 변천 속에서 우리 도시 성찰
한국도시행정학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2024 .06
-
경기도 도시계획을 위한 기초조사정보체계 구축방안
정책연구
2021 .11
-
새마을운동과의 비교를 통한 마을만들기 사업의 실천전략 연구
한국지역개발학회지
2015 .12
-
국토 · 환경 통합관리의 실현성 강화를 위한 제도적 개선방안
환경정책
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
도시공원 일몰제에 대한 법적 개선방안 연구
강석점
동아법학
2018
.08
경기도 장기미집행 도시계획시설 해소를 위한중장기적 정책방향
황금회
,
이양주
,
김채만
외 2명
정책연구
2017
.06
장기미집행 도시·군계획시설 현황과 과제Ⅱ : 도로시설을 중심으로
윤중경
,
맹다미
,
지남석
외 5명
도시정보
2015
.11
장기미집행 도시공원에서의 개발행위 특례 적용을 위한 모의분석 연구
김성용
,
이창수
국토계획
2010
.10
장기미집행 도시공원일몰제 대응 공(功)과 과(過)
구자훈
,
맹지연
,
오충현
외 5명
도시정보
2019
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0