지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The relief for legal right is taken in charge by the system of a series of legal disputes which consist of both application of appeals in administration and administrative litigation in courts in detail. These all play an important role, but this study mainly examines the application of appeals in administration and explores the administrative litigation in courts as necessary. The reason that chooses the application of appeals in administration(Focused on the objection or request for review ) is as follows.
First of all, all of the statutes on the fields of the Act on Social Security require the prepositive principle of application of appeals. In this context, the application of appeals in administration is regarded as a first relief of legal rights on the fields of Act on Social Security. Second, with respect to the application of appeals in administration, the merit on the civilian`s perspective is referred as the simplicity, speediness, and fee free. If a civilian who applies for appeals currently has needs that exist in the emergency considered on the characteristic of the fields of the Act on Social Security, this is required much stronger than other administrative fields. Third, after applying the application of appeals in administration, filing a suit in courts and three level judgments are guaranteed, but if considering the existence of needs and emergency, it is possible that a civilian who receives the relief of legal right by the application of appeals reluctantly waives filing a suit in courts. In this regard, the relief of legal right is fulfilled by the only application of appeals in administration in reality. Like this, the application of appeals in administration as the final relief of legal right on the fields of the Act on Social Security specially has the importance as the precondition that it is not easy to win administrative litigations. For the reality of the relief of legal right on the fields of the Act on Social Security, the main subject of study is limited as administrative appeals for review(objection, request for review or etc.) from the purpose of this study.
It is necessary to analyze appeals for review on the fields of the Act on Social Security on any perspective. This study uses the first analytical tool, the perspective that the appeals agency for review is in charge of positive exercise of its authority . It is general to use the term, the ex officio principle related with the term, the parteienprinzip principle, but this study affectedly uses the independent definition of positive exercise of its authority in lieu of using the term of the ex officio principle. In addition, this study has the final purpose that intends to suggestions to the Korean laws through comparative study. Regarding decision of the subject country of this study, the reason why it chose the United Kingdom is as follows since the main purpose is to give the suggestions to the Korean laws.
First of all, all of the statutes on the fields of the Act on Social Security require the prepositive principle of application of appeals. In this context, the application of appeals in administration is regarded as a first relief of legal rights on the fields of Act on Social Security. Second, with respect to the application of appeals in administration, the merit on the civilian`s perspective is referred as the simplicity, speediness, and fee free. If a civilian who applies for appeals currently has needs that exist in the emergency considered on the characteristic of the fields of the Act on Social Security, this is required much stronger than other administrative fields. Third, after applying the application of appeals in administration, filing a suit in courts and three level judgments are guaranteed, but if considering the existence of needs and emergency, it is possible that a civilian who receives the relief of legal right by the application of appeals reluctantly waives filing a suit in courts. In this regard, the relief of legal right is fulfilled by the only application of appeals in administration in reality. Like this, the application of appeals in administration as the final relief of legal right on the fields of the Act on Social Security specially has the importance as the precondition that it is not easy to win administrative litigations. For the reality of the relief of legal right on the fields of the Act on Social Security, the main subject of study is limited as administrative appeals for review(objection, request for review or etc.) from the purpose of this study.
It is necessary to analyze appeals for review on the fields of the Act on Social Security on any perspective. This study uses the first analytical tool, the perspective that the appeals agency for review is in charge of positive exercise of its authority . It is general to use the term, the ex officio principle related with the term, the parteienprinzip principle, but this study affectedly uses the independent definition of positive exercise of its authority in lieu of using the term of the ex officio principle. In addition, this study has the final purpose that intends to suggestions to the Korean laws through comparative study. Regarding decision of the subject country of this study, the reason why it chose the United Kingdom is as follows since the main purpose is to give the suggestions to the Korean laws.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 영국에서의 권리구제 제도
Ⅲ. 영국심판소제도에서 직권행사
Ⅳ. 직권행사법리의 확립
Ⅴ. 독립성과 직권행사
Ⅵ. 결론에 대신하여 - 시사점
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
개별법상 이의신청제도의 현황분석과 입법적 개선과제 : 이의신청 등과 행정심판의 관계정립을 중심으로
행정법연구
2015 .07
-
사회서비스영역에서 권리구제 절차의 정합성 확보방안
사회복지법제연구
2016 .01
-
국세불복제도 운용현황 분석 및 개선방안
조세연구
2025 .03
-
行政審判의 기능과 審判機關의 구성 : ‘行政審判의 司法化’에 대한 異議
행정법연구
2015 .07
-
형사소송에서의 상고이유 제한 법리에 대한 검토 - 대법원 2019. 3. 21. 선고 2017도16593-1 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로-
형사소송 이론과 실무
2021 .12
-
「행정기본법」 상 이의신청제도에 대한 고찰 -「국세기본법」 상 이의신청제도와의 비교를 중심으로-
법학연구
2022 .12
-
행정심판 재결의 기속력과 피청구인인 행정청의 불복가능성
행정법연구
2018 .08
-
행정심판 전치주의의 예외에 대한 고찰 - 동종사건에 대한 대법원 판례를 중심으로 -
공법학연구
2022 .02
-
사회보장사건 구제절차에 관한 고찰 — 영국과 미국의 법제를 중심으로 —
행정법연구
2023 .08
-
독일 사회법의 주요 분쟁 유형과 사회법원의 역할 - 사회법원 통계 분석을 중심으로 -
가천법학
2023 .03
-
「행정심판법」 상 취소심판의 쟁송물
한양법학
2018 .08
-
세법상 조정제도의 도입에 관한 연구
조세법연구
2023 .11
-
행정심판제도의 현황과 발전방향
행정법연구
2015 .11
-
「행정기본법」상 이의신청에 관한 고찰
법학연구
2022 .02
-
피고인과 검사의 항소에 대한 차별적 취급의 타당성에 관한 연구
형사법의 신동향
2021 .01
-
異議申請節次와 提訴期間
행정판례연구
2015 .06
-
제소기간 관련 행정심판 청구형식의 적법성에 대한 고찰 - 대법원 판례를 중심으로 -
경희법학
2021 .12
-
2022년 민사소송법 중요판례평석
인권과 정의
2023 .05
-
행정심판법과 비교를 통한 조세불복절차의 문제점과 개선방안
입법학연구
2020 .01
-
근로복지공단에 의한 사업종류 변경결정의 처분성 - 프랑스 월권소송의 대상 확대에 관한 최근의 사례와 관련하여 -
행정판례연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0