지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제41호
- 발행연도
- 2017.10
- 수록면
- 160 - 178 (19page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2017.10.41.160
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Titus 2:13 causes a significant discussion about the translation as popular versions of the English Bible show the disagreement (NIV, NAS/RSV, KJV etc.). This phenomenon can also be found in the Korean Bible translations. The key issue of the translation is whether Titus 2:13 calls Jesus “God”. So the question that arises is whether the two titles “God” and “Savior” (θεός and σωτῆρος) refer to one person, Jesus Christ (the Son) or to two persons (the Father and the Son). Possibly, the occurrence of this issue is due to the fact that in order to understand the verse, it is necessary to have profound comprehension about the complexity of the origin Greek syntax externally and also about the (Pauline) Christology of early Christianity internally.
In the case of the complexity of the Greek Syntax, we should focus on the two καί in the middle of the sentence. Especially the second καί plays an important role which connects the two titles θεός and σωτήρ. But the difficulties here are to distinguish whether these two titles are tied together only to Christ or whether they are used separately for God and Christ respectively. Unlike what is often mentioned here, I do not think the Granville Sharp Rule (The-Substantive-καί-Substantive) applies strictly. I therefore also see here that the second καί has the function not as an appositional but as an equivalent conjunction. In the case of the title interchange between God and Christ, it is often overestimated in the discussion regarding Christ’s divine nature. Certainly the σωτήρ’s use of God-Christ interchange is widely and frequently recognized. The application of salvation can be the predication of Christ as well as the Father. But for the usage of the title θεός in the phenomenon appears very limitedly and carefully. That is an evidence that it is difficult to clearly and explicitly designate Jesus Christ as θεός.
Beginning with Ross’s first complete translation of the New Testament 『예수셩교젼셔』 (1887), early Korean Bible versions have been influenced by English translations like the Revised Version (RV) and the King James Version (KJV). According to the translation tradition of these versions, Titus 2:13 in early versions of the Korean Bible has been translated, in terms of content, into the two-persons phrase. Though the process of translating and revising, the text has been modified according to the specificity of the Korean language such as spacing words and especially omitting the second ί. In this κα regard, the New Korean Revised Version (1998) which is the official Bible in Korea for liturgy that has inherited this tradition of Korean Bible translation seems to simply give a list of majestic titles. In the next revision of this Bible, it is necessary to clarify the grammatical relationship and the theological position.
In the case of the complexity of the Greek Syntax, we should focus on the two καί in the middle of the sentence. Especially the second καί plays an important role which connects the two titles θεός and σωτήρ. But the difficulties here are to distinguish whether these two titles are tied together only to Christ or whether they are used separately for God and Christ respectively. Unlike what is often mentioned here, I do not think the Granville Sharp Rule (The-Substantive-καί-Substantive) applies strictly. I therefore also see here that the second καί has the function not as an appositional but as an equivalent conjunction. In the case of the title interchange between God and Christ, it is often overestimated in the discussion regarding Christ’s divine nature. Certainly the σωτήρ’s use of God-Christ interchange is widely and frequently recognized. The application of salvation can be the predication of Christ as well as the Father. But for the usage of the title θεός in the phenomenon appears very limitedly and carefully. That is an evidence that it is difficult to clearly and explicitly designate Jesus Christ as θεός.
Beginning with Ross’s first complete translation of the New Testament 『예수셩교젼셔』 (1887), early Korean Bible versions have been influenced by English translations like the Revised Version (RV) and the King James Version (KJV). According to the translation tradition of these versions, Titus 2:13 in early versions of the Korean Bible has been translated, in terms of content, into the two-persons phrase. Though the process of translating and revising, the text has been modified according to the specificity of the Korean language such as spacing words and especially omitting the second ί. In this κα regard, the New Korean Revised Version (1998) which is the official Bible in Korea for liturgy that has inherited this tradition of Korean Bible translation seems to simply give a list of majestic titles. In the next revision of this Bible, it is necessary to clarify the grammatical relationship and the theological position.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 디도서 2:13의 본문 분석
3. 우리의 크신 하나님과 구주에 대한 해석
4. 디도서 2:13의 한글성경 번역 약사
5. 나오는 말
〈참고문헌〉(References)
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영어 성경 번역의 역사
성경원문연구
2018 .04
-
『개역개정』 성경 개정을 위한 문체 논의
성경원문연구
2022 .04
-
십계명(출 20:1-17)의 중(中) · 한(韓) 성서 비교 연구
구약논단
2019 .09
-
영어성경(NIV)의 한국어 번역에 대한 몇 가지 제안 - 마태복음을 중심으로 -
영어영문학
2019 .08
-
Translating Scripture for Sound and Performance: New Directions in Biblical Studies : James A. Maxey and Ernst R. Wendland, eds., Biblical Performance Criticism 6, Eugene: Cascade Books, 2012
성경원문연구
2018 .04
-
디도서의 구원론적 성령 이해 - 디도서 3장 4-8절을 중심으로
신약논단
2023 .06
-
20세기 이전 중국어 성서 번역의 역사와 의의
한국기독교신학논총
2019 .10
-
The Japanese Translations of the Hebrew Bible: History, Inventory and Analysis (Doron B. Cohen, Leiden: Brill, 2013)
성경원문연구
2022 .04
-
중국 고대기독교 경교의 『성경』 번역
번역학연구
2015 .06
-
한글번역성경들의 원문충실도 비교연구 (Ⅱ) : 본 교단이 사용하는 성경번역(신약)들을 중심으로
신학지남
2017 .12
-
영화제목의 번역- 충실성과 창의성 사이의 선택 -
통번역교육연구
2020 .01
-
영한 및 한영 소설 제목의 번역 양상 고찰
통역과 번역
2015 .01
-
한국 영화 제목의 러시아어 번역 양상에 대한 연구- 영어 제목과의 연관성을 고려하여
통역과 번역
2016 .01
-
1912년 간행된 중국어 성경의 언어 특징 연구 — 『쉐레쉐브스키 쉬운 문리역』과 『관화체화합본』의 마태복음을 중심으로
중국문화연구
2022 .08
-
골로새서 1:13-20에 나타난 우주적 교회론
신학논단
2017 .03
-
한글성경 번역을 위한 희구법 카탈 적용의 필요성
성경원문연구
2017 .04
-
현대 몽골어 성경 번역에 관한 한 소고 : 〈몽골성경번역위원회본〉에서 〈몽골성서공회본〉으로
성경원문연구
2018 .04
-
16세기 종교개혁과 성경(관) : 종교 개혁자 존 칼빈과 이후 개혁신학의 전통에 관한 연구를 중심으로
신학지남
2017 .03
-
한영 소설 제목의 시대별·번역사별 번역 전략 양상 연구
번역학연구
2019 .12
-
이민 신학의 그 중심 속에 있는 기독론 ― 존 칼빈의 그리스도와의 연합 사상 관점으로 본 성육신론과 그리스도의 삼중직론을 중심으로
한국조직신학논총
2023 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-233-001320603