지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article was written for understanding of memories of residents in Jeju. Because Jeju have be placed in the small province in Korea and the residents was regraded as the minority in the national community, the understanding of the memories is a way in studying of minority"s memories in Korea.
Using the three case-‘Sambyelcho(三別抄)’, the memorials in Jeju, and ‘the Jeju Uprising’, April 3th 1948, I"d like to study the memories. Sambyelcho(三別抄) was a army, a special capital defense unit, in Goryo dynasty(高麗), they resisted against the Mongol. But after Goryo dynasty surrendered to Mongol, Sambyelcho rose in revolt, controled the Jindo, Jeju, and the south coast in Goryo dynasty. The residents in Jeju have the two memories of Sambyelcho, in which it was the traitor to Goryo dynasty or resistant against Mongol and his collaborators. In fact, this memories was not Jeju people"s memory but the national one. Jeju didn"t have own memories of Sambyelcho for long time. Nowaday, there was the change in the memory, Jeju begin to say own voice, then they would differently regard Sambyelcho as the destroyer of the peace in Jeju. However, this voice was still low, powerless. Since 1970s, Sambyelcho was the resistant against Mongol and his collaborates.
In order to understand the residents"s memory, I try to search the memorials in Jeju, especially the idols such as General Lee Sun Sin, King Sejong, located in the school. I explored the idols in the 42 elementary schools, then I realized that Jeju same as the other places, had the great names of history, General Lee Sun Sin, King Sejong. There were not the memorials whcih could show the specificity of Jeju for us.
‘The Jeju Uprising’ was very important in Jeju, in understanding the memory of Jeju. ‘The Jeju Uprising’ was a resistance movement which the left rose in arms against the U.S military government, in April 3, 1948. Because about thirty thousand people was killed by Korean government forces, most residents in Jeju should have remembered it. For sixty years, the Jeju Uprising was remembered through three ways. First, it was regarded as the communist revolt incited by left agitator. Second, it was the Jeju people"s liberation movement, which Jeju peoples struggled against American imperialism and the Korean collaborates who would like to devide the Korean nation into two nations. Third, it was the genocide to exclude the left wing people out of nation. Lee Seung Man government killed 30,000 peoples to constitute the anti-communist nation, it was clearly the destroy of the civil right. However, this memories exactly coincided with national one.
According to my research, there was not the specific memory in Jeju, which could defined own culture as a minority for majority. But Do not need to be disappointded. I find that the Jeju"s memories were estranged from the national one. The residents in Jeju would remember Sambyelcho and the Jeju Uprising as own way beyond nation. Sambyelcho was just the destroyer of pecae in Jeju. Some students form Jeju argued that the understanding of Jeju Uprising in the national level, never cure their injured memory.
Using the three case-‘Sambyelcho(三別抄)’, the memorials in Jeju, and ‘the Jeju Uprising’, April 3th 1948, I"d like to study the memories. Sambyelcho(三別抄) was a army, a special capital defense unit, in Goryo dynasty(高麗), they resisted against the Mongol. But after Goryo dynasty surrendered to Mongol, Sambyelcho rose in revolt, controled the Jindo, Jeju, and the south coast in Goryo dynasty. The residents in Jeju have the two memories of Sambyelcho, in which it was the traitor to Goryo dynasty or resistant against Mongol and his collaborators. In fact, this memories was not Jeju people"s memory but the national one. Jeju didn"t have own memories of Sambyelcho for long time. Nowaday, there was the change in the memory, Jeju begin to say own voice, then they would differently regard Sambyelcho as the destroyer of the peace in Jeju. However, this voice was still low, powerless. Since 1970s, Sambyelcho was the resistant against Mongol and his collaborates.
In order to understand the residents"s memory, I try to search the memorials in Jeju, especially the idols such as General Lee Sun Sin, King Sejong, located in the school. I explored the idols in the 42 elementary schools, then I realized that Jeju same as the other places, had the great names of history, General Lee Sun Sin, King Sejong. There were not the memorials whcih could show the specificity of Jeju for us.
‘The Jeju Uprising’ was very important in Jeju, in understanding the memory of Jeju. ‘The Jeju Uprising’ was a resistance movement which the left rose in arms against the U.S military government, in April 3, 1948. Because about thirty thousand people was killed by Korean government forces, most residents in Jeju should have remembered it. For sixty years, the Jeju Uprising was remembered through three ways. First, it was regarded as the communist revolt incited by left agitator. Second, it was the Jeju people"s liberation movement, which Jeju peoples struggled against American imperialism and the Korean collaborates who would like to devide the Korean nation into two nations. Third, it was the genocide to exclude the left wing people out of nation. Lee Seung Man government killed 30,000 peoples to constitute the anti-communist nation, it was clearly the destroy of the civil right. However, this memories exactly coincided with national one.
According to my research, there was not the specific memory in Jeju, which could defined own culture as a minority for majority. But Do not need to be disappointded. I find that the Jeju"s memories were estranged from the national one. The residents in Jeju would remember Sambyelcho and the Jeju Uprising as own way beyond nation. Sambyelcho was just the destroyer of pecae in Jeju. Some students form Jeju argued that the understanding of Jeju Uprising in the national level, never cure their injured memory.
목차
머리말: 소수자와 기억
Ⅰ. 三別抄와 제주
Ⅱ. 제주의 기념시설
Ⅲ. 평화의 섬 제주
맺음말: 제주의 기억술
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제주 민중에게 제주 4.3은 무엇이었는가-민주화 이행기 제주 4.3이 민중항쟁으로 재현되는 과정과 방식-
우리문학연구
2023 .07
-
Performing Commemoration, Textualizing Remembering in “Easter 1916”
한국 예이츠 저널
2018 .01
-
고려 원종(元宗)대 송송례(宋松禮)의 대몽외교와 군사활동
한국사연구
2022 .09
-
분쟁 이후 도시에서 기억의 실행: 키르기스스탄 오쉬의 기념물을 중심으로
도시인문학연구
2018 .01
-
김시종의 제주4·3 항쟁- 폭력에 대한 저항 기억 -
영주어문
2024 .02
-
18세기 제주의 진상제(進上制)와 상품유통
한국사연구
2019 .09
-
포스트소비에트 카자흐스탄의 2차 세계대전 기념물 - 다르게 말하기와 기억의 조작 사이에서
도시인문학연구
2020 .01
-
[지역] 원도심 살리는 문화유산 정책의 혁신 : 인천시 기념물 2호 화도진지, 위치도 기념물도 잘못됐다
황해문화
2022 .03
-
‘5․18광주민주화운동’과 ‘기억’의 방식 : 문순태의 5·18 관련 소설을 중심으로
현대소설연구
2015 .04
-
제주방언에 대한 방언 태도 연구-제주 지역 공무원을 중심으로-
방언학
2020 .01
-
김시종의 ‘재일’과 제주 4․3의 시적 형상화
한민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
한반도 사드배치 이후 중국 온라인 미디어 분석을 통한 제주도 이미지 제고방안 연구
중국학
2019 .01
-
편입의 욕망과 저항의 미학 -오시로 다쓰히로의 「신의 섬」과 제주 4·3 소설을 중심으로-
한민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
근현대 제주 잡지의 지형과 특성
어문논집
2024 .08
-
이행기 정의 서사전략으로서의 4·3 전사(前史) 다시 쓰기와 제주 민중/여성의 복원 －한림화의 『한라산의 노을』(1991)을 중심으로
현대소설연구
2024 .06
-
조선~근대 제주 유학 지식인의 형성과 발전에 관한 시론
대동한문학(大東漢文學)
2023 .06
-
북한 당대시로 본 ‘무자제주참변’
한국언어문학
2016 .01
-
제주 줄다리기[照里戱]의 역사문화원형 복원과 축제콘텐츠 개발
지방사와 지방문화
2017 .11
-
프랑스 제3공화정 역사 기념물 정책 －1887년 역사 기념물 보존법을 중심으로－
史叢(사총)
2024 .09
-
제주방언화자의 낱말 엑센트: 제주화자와 재일제주인 화자의 비교연구
언어학연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-911-000985567