메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제17집 제3호
발행연도
2015.9
수록면
53 - 79 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
「Act on acquisition of and compensation for land, etc. 「 for public works projects」(AACL) provides that project operator acquire and compensate for land etc. for public works projects. AACL, provides things in takings jurisprudence, is different from Civil act. Because the concept of things is messily provided, things is understood and provided in classified as things of in a narrow sense, obstacle, things of in a broad sense There is the opposition between relocation principle and acquisition principle for compensation of obstacle. AACL adopted the relocation principle. In view of the compensation practice and realistic changes for obstacle, however, relocation principle must be changed to acquisition principle. In case obstacle was determined a price compensation and given a relocation decision, the Supreme Court judged that project operator can’t acquire ownership. But project operator can remove obstacle at his ownexpense and owner must endure removal. Therefore, in case he did not acquire ownership and has lost obstacle, he did nor burden liability for damages. Even if the Supreme Court reached a right conclusion denying liability for damages of project operator, the process was not squarely logic leading to the conclusion. It was originated from illogical and unsystematic AACL. So the provisions of the takings and compensation for obstacle will be logically and systematically improved.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002578823